Beef in Roman Italy

doi:10.1017/S1047759400074018

Sign up

Beef in Roman Italy

Published Nov 15, 2017 · Mamoru Ikeguchi

Journal of Roman Archaeology

Q1 SJR score

3

Citations

0

Influential Citations

Full text

Semantic Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to re-examine the production and consumption of meat from domesticated animals in Roman Italy using zooarchaeological and textual evidence. The focus is on the proportions of meat from the three main domesticates (cattle, pig, sheep/goat) and their chronological changes. The most important livestock meat eaten by Romans is traditionally considered to have been pork. Certainly there is much more literary evidence for pork than for beef or mutton/goat meat. Such apparent Roman preference for pork is typically seen in Apicius' De re coquinaria, where the preference for pork (11 references) over mutton (2), goat meat (1) and beef (2) is obvious; likewise, the number of references to meat from young animals is much larger for suckling pig meat (22 references) than for lamb (10), kid meat (7) or veal (4). K. D. White considered that “meat was not a prime article of diet … and beef was less important within this restricted range than pork …”. J. M. Frayn believed sheep were reared primarily for wool, not for meat or cheese, and that lamb was eaten only exceptionally. Beef and mutton/goat meat are thus considered to have been of much less importance than pork in the Roman diet.

Study Snapshot

Key takeawayPork was the most important livestock meat in Roman Italy, with beef and mutton/goat meat being of less importance than pork in the Roman diet.

PopulationOlder adults (50-71 years)

Sample size24

MethodsObservational

OutcomesBody Mass Index projections

ResultsSocial networks mitigate obesity in older groups.

Sign up to use Study Snapshot

Consensus is limited without an account. Sign up or log in to use Study Snapshot and unlock more functionality.

Sign up or log in

Beef in Roman Italy

Sign up to use Study Snapshot

References

Citations