Paper
Self-regulation in the modification of disruptive classroom behavior.
Published Dec 1, 1972 · Orin D. Bolstad, S. M. Johnson
Journal of applied behavior analysis
202
Citations
8
Influential Citations
Abstract
This study compared self-regulation and external regulation procedures in the treatment of children's disruptive classroom behavior. After baseline data were collected, three of the four most disruptive children in each of 10 first- and second-grade classrooms received reinforcement for achieving low rates of disruptive behavior. The fourth child served as a control subject throughout the experiment. Two of the three experimental subjects were then taught to self-observe their own disruptive behavior. In the final reinforcement period, these subjects were given control over dispensing reinforcers to themselves, based on their self-collected behavioral data while subjects in the other experimental group continued with the externally managed reinforcement. In extinction, reinforcement was discontinued for all subjects, but one of the self-regulation subjects in each classroom continued overtly to self-observe. Results indicated that both reinforcement programs reduced disruptive behavior. The self-regulation procedures were slightly more effective in reducing disruptiveness than was the external regulation procedure, and this advantage persisted into extinction. These results suggest that self-regulation procedures provide a practical, inexpensive, and powerful alternative in dealing with disruptive behavior in children.
Non-RCT
Highly CitedSelf-regulation procedures are slightly more effective than external regulation procedures in reducing disruptive classroom behavior in children, with advantages persisting even after extinction.
Full text analysis coming soon...