The Effects of Low-Load Vs. High-Load Resistance Training on Muscle Fiber Hypertrophy: A Meta-Analysis

doi:10.2478/hukin-2020-0013

Paper

The Effects of Low-Load Vs. High-Load Resistance Training on Muscle Fiber Hypertrophy: A Meta-Analysis

Published Aug 1, 2020 · J. Grgic

Journal of Human Kinetics

Q1 SJR score

20

Citations

1

Influential Citations

Full text Semantic Scholar

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this meta-analysis was to explore the effects of low-load vs. high-load resistance training on type I and type II muscle fiber hypertrophy. Searches for studies were performed through ten databases. Studies were included if they: (a) compared the effects of low-load vs. high-load resistance training (performed to momentary muscular failure); and, (b) assessed muscle fiber hypertrophy. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to analyze the data. Ten study groups were included in the analysis. In the meta-analysis for the effects of low-load vs. high-load resistance training on type I muscle fiber hypertrophy, there was no significant difference between the training conditions (standardized mean difference: 0.28; 95% confidence interval: –0.27, 0.82; p = 0.316; I2 = 18%; 95% prediction interval: –0.71, 1.28). In the meta-analysis for the effects of low-load vs. high-load resistance training on type II muscle fiber hypertrophy, there was no significant difference between the training conditions (standardized mean difference: 0.30; 95% confidence interval: –0.05, 0.66; p = 0.089; I2 = 0%; 95% prediction interval: –0.28, 0.88). In this meta-analysis, there were no significant differences between low-load and high-load resistance training on hypertrophy of type I or type II muscle fibers. The 95% confidence and prediction intervals were very wide, suggesting that the true effect in the population and the effect reported in a future study conducted on this topic could be in different directions and anywhere from trivial to very large. Therefore, there is a clear need for future research on this topic.

Very Rigorous Journal

Study Snapshot

Key takeawayLow-load and high-load resistance training show no significant differences in muscle fiber hypertrophy, suggesting a need for future research on this topic.

PopulationOlder adults (50-71 years)

Sample size24

MethodsObservational

OutcomesBody Mass Index projections

ResultsSocial networks mitigate obesity in older groups.

Sign up to use Study Snapshot

Consensus is limited without an account. Create an account or sign in to get more searches and use the Study Snapshot.

Create an account

Paper

The Effects of Low-Load Vs. High-Load Resistance Training on Muscle Fiber Hypertrophy: A Meta-Analysis

Sign up to use Study Snapshot

References

Acute Effects of Different Training Loads on Affective Responses in Resistance-trained Men

Resistance training with a light load until failure induces higher degrees of effort, discomfort, and displeasure compared to a moderate load in resistance-trained men.

Muscle fibre activation is unaffected by load and repetition duration when resistance exercise is performed to task failure

Performing resistance exercise to task failure regardless of load or repetition duration activates type II muscle fibers, leading to muscle fiber activation and hypertrophy.

A Critical Evaluation of the Biological Construct Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: Size Matters but So Does the Measurement

The biological construct of skeletal muscle hypertrophy is complex and influenced by various measurement methods, highlighting the need for improved research in this area.

Inducing hypertrophic effects of type I skeletal muscle fibers: A hypothetical role of time under load in resistance training aimed at muscular hypertrophy.

Low load resistance training may induce greater hypertrophy of type I muscle fibers due to their lower fatigability and higher oxidative capacity compared to type II muscle fibers.

Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations Between Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

High-load resistance training provides greater gains in 1RM strength, while muscle hypertrophy can be equally achieved across a spectrum of loading ranges.

Equivalence Tests

Equivalence tests, such as the two one-sided tests (TOST), can help psychologists easily reject the presence of significant effects, improving their statistical and theoretical inferences.

Effect of Movement Velocity During Resistance Training on Dynamic Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fast and moderate-slow resistance training both improve dynamic muscular strength, with fast training showing a trend for superior strength gains at moderate intensities.

Neither load nor systemic hormones determine resistance training-mediated hypertrophy or strength gains in resistance-trained young men

Load and systemic hormones do not determine muscle strength and hypertrophy gains in resistance-trained young men.

Citations

Remobilization with whole-body vibration improves functionality, histomorphometric parameters, and AQP1 expression in the soleus muscle of Wistar rats.

Remobilization with whole-body vibration (WBV) improves soleus muscle functionality, histomorphometric parameters, and AQP1 expression in Wistar rats after immobilization.

Skeletal muscle adaptations to high‐intensity, low‐volume concurrent resistance and interval training in recreationally active men and women

A 12-week concurrent resistance and interval training program increased strength and lean body mass in recreationally active men and women, but not aerobic capacity or skeletal muscle adaptations underpinning aerobic performance.

The Effects of Accessory Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscle Size and Strength in Division III Soccer Athletes: A Preliminary Ecological Study

BFRT and HIRT both increase muscle strength and circumference in Division III soccer players, suggesting that BFRT could be incorporated into collegiate athlete training.

Intentionally Slow Concentric Velocity Resistance Exercise and Strength Adaptations: A Meta-Analysis

Intentionally slow-velocity resistance exercise (ISVRE) does not significantly increase muscular strength compared to fast or traditional velocities, contrary to previous reviews.

Resistance training prescription for muscle strength and hypertrophy in healthy adults: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

All resistance training prescriptions improve muscle strength and hypertrophy compared to no exercise, with higher-load, multiset, thrice-weekly training being the most effective for strength gains.