Paper
The Physiological Responses of Obese and Non-obese Women to Arm Ergometry
Published 2010 · Charlene M. Henry
1
Citations
0
Influential Citations
Abstract
Lynn A. Darby, Advisor Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the physiological characteristics and responses of obese and non-obese women to arm ergometry. Some exercises (e.g. walking, cycling, etc.) may be too demanding for obese individuals. Therefore, arm ergometry may be a better exercise in the obese population because it utilizes a smaller muscle mass and is nonweight bearing. This is necessary so that exercise physiologists, physicians, and personal trainers can prescribe individualized exercise programs using the arm ergometer as physical activity in obese individuals who cannot tolerate the stress of other forms of exercise. Methods: Twenty, low risk females aged 18 to 22 years old participated in this study. Anthropometric measurements included were: height, weight, abdominal diameter, arm, waist and hip circumferences, skinfolds, and arm volume. The participants also completed a progressive, continuous, multistage arm ergometry exercise test using a modified Monark cycle ergometer to exhaustion. Oxygen consumption, ratings of perceived exertion, respiratory exchange ratio, ventilation, and heart rate were assessed every minute during the exercise test. Independentsamples t test were calculated. Results: Significant differences were found between the means for the obese and non-obese groups for body weight (kg) t = -5.47, p <.05, df=18, BMI (kg/m 2 ) t = -6.09, p < .05, df =18, body fat % t = -8.25, p <.05, df=18, waist circumference (cm) t = -6.27, p <.05, df=18, hip circumference (cm) t = -5.75, p <.05, df=18, waist to hip ratio t = -2.66, p <.05, df=18, abdominal diameter (cm) t = -6.02, p <.05, df=18, and HRmax (b . min -1 ) t = -2.15, p <.05, df=18, arm circumference t = -2.9, p<.05, df =18, arm volume t = -3.62, p<.05, df = 18, and upper arm fat mass t = -4.92, p < .05, df = 18 . For VO2 (ml . kg . min -1 ), a significant interaction was found between Group x Time F = 7.51, p < .0001, df = 5. Differences between the obese
Non-RCTObese women show better physiological responses to arm ergometry than non-obese women, suggesting it may be a better exercise option for obese individuals.
Full text analysis coming soon...