Does ability grouping improve student achievement?
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
The Impact of Ability Grouping on Student Achievement
Introduction to Ability Grouping and Student Achievement
Ability grouping, the practice of dividing students into groups based on their academic capabilities, has been a topic of debate for decades. Researchers have explored its effects on student achievement across various educational levels and subjects. This article synthesizes findings from multiple studies to provide a comprehensive understanding of whether ability grouping improves student achievement.
Positive Effects of Within-Class Ability Grouping
Benefits in Specific Subjects
Research indicates that within-class ability grouping can positively impact student achievement, particularly in subjects like mathematics and reading. For instance, within-class grouping in mathematics has been found to be instructionally effective, with a median effect size of +0.34. Similarly, cross-grade ability grouping for reading, such as the Joplin Plan, shows a significant positive effect with a median effect size of +0.45.
General Academic Benefits
A meta-analysis of 13 studies on ability grouping revealed that within-class grouping, cross-grade subject grouping, and special grouping for gifted students generally benefit student achievement. Effect sizes ranged from 0.19 to 0.37, indicating moderate positive impacts. These benefits were consistent across high-, medium-, and low-ability students.
Mixed Outcomes of Between-Class Ability Grouping
Limited Overall Impact
The effects of between-class ability grouping, where students are placed in separate classes based on ability, are less clear. Studies show that this form of grouping has negligible overall effects on student achievement. For example, a review of secondary school students found that the overall achievement effects of between-class grouping were essentially zero. Similarly, another study reported that the benefits and liabilities of ability grouping cancel each other out, resulting in negligible overall gains.
Differential Effects on High and Low Achievers
While high-ability students may experience slight benefits from between-class grouping, low-ability students often face negative impacts. High-group placement generally has a weak positive effect, whereas low-group placement has a stronger negative effect. This suggests that while advanced students might gain from ability grouping, slower students could be disadvantaged.
Role of School Context and Teacher Support
School Characteristics
The effectiveness of ability grouping can vary significantly based on school characteristics. In schools with advantageous contexts, such as private schools, ability grouping may improve achievement for all students and reduce achievement inequalities, particularly benefiting low-ability students. Conversely, in public, low-performing, and high-minority schools, ability grouping often has no effect or negative effects, especially for low-ability students.
Importance of Teacher Support
Teacher support plays a crucial role in mediating the effects of ability grouping. High-ability groups tend to receive greater levels of teacher support, which partly explains their higher achievement levels. Moreover, when low-ability students receive high levels of teacher support, they can achieve as much as high-ability students in certain subjects, such as English.
Conclusion
The impact of ability grouping on student achievement is complex and context-dependent. While within-class ability grouping and specific subject grouping can yield positive outcomes, between-class grouping shows mixed results, often benefiting high-ability students at the expense of low-ability ones. School characteristics and teacher support are critical factors that influence the effectiveness of ability grouping. Therefore, educators and policymakers should consider these variables when implementing ability grouping strategies to ensure they support all students' academic growth.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic