Searched over 200M research papers for "amputated arm"
10 papers analyzed
Some studies suggest replantation of a traumatically amputated arm leads to better function and higher satisfaction rates, while other studies highlight the complex brain reorganization and potential phantom sensations following amputation.
20 papers analyzed
Bilateral brachial plexus injuries can result in complete loss of motor and sensory function in the upper extremities, as seen in the case of a young child named Jeremy. Despite extensive physical therapy, no improvement in arm function was noted, leading to frequent falls and injuries. Jeremy's parents requested bilateral upper-extremity amputation, believing it would improve his quality of life by reducing the weight and interference of his non-functional arms. However, the medical team disagreed, citing a lack of medical benefit and ethical concerns.
A systematic review compared the outcomes of replantation and prosthetic fitting in traumatic arm amputations. Replantation generally led to higher satisfaction and better functional outcomes, especially in below-elbow amputations. Nearly 100% of patients were satisfied with their replanted limbs, while a significant portion of prosthesis users reported issues such as pain and functional superfluity. Sensation and psychological well-being were major advantages of replantation over prosthetics .
Arm amputation triggers significant reorganization in the brain's functional connectivity. Research using resting-state fMRI revealed that the cortical territory of the missing hand undergoes extensive remapping, affecting both the sensorimotor network and the default mode network (DMN). This reorganization may contribute to phantom sensations and pain experienced by amputees.
Studies comparing the functional outcomes of replantation and prosthetic fitting found that replantation often results in superior functional capacity. Younger patients with more distal injuries tend to have better outcomes. The Carroll test showed that replanted limbs had a higher proportion of excellent or good outcomes compared to prosthetic limbs, particularly in below-elbow injuries.
Electrophysiological studies on patients with partial limb amputation revealed significant reductions in nerve action potentials and conduction velocity in the amputated limbs. These changes indicate that peripheral input is crucial for maintaining the functional integrity of motor and sensory nerve axons. Overuse of the intact limb may lead to reduced inhibition in the contralateral somatosensory cortex.
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has shown promise in improving the control of prosthetic arms. By recognizing motion intentions from brain signals, fNIRS-based systems can classify various upper limb actions with high accuracy. This technology could enhance the real-time control of transhumeral prostheses, offering better functionality for amputees.
Amputation decisions, especially in cases of severe brachial plexus injuries, involve complex ethical and medical considerations. Urgent amputation may be necessary in cases of irreparable vascular injury or overwhelming sepsis. Elective amputation can be considered for rehabilitation purposes at the patient's request, although it does not alleviate pain from preganglionic injuries.
The decision to amputate an arm, whether due to traumatic injury or congenital conditions, involves a multifaceted evaluation of functional outcomes, psychological well-being, and ethical considerations. Replantation often provides better functional and psychological results compared to prosthetics, while advances in brain-machine interfaces hold promise for improving prosthetic control. Understanding the extensive brain reorganization following amputation can also help address phantom limb sensations and pain. Each case requires a tailored approach to ensure the best possible outcome for the patient.
Most relevant research papers on this topic