Arguments supporting global warming
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Arguments Supporting Global Warming
Scientific Consensus on Global Warming
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Temperature Rise
The term "global warming" refers to the observed increase in Earth's mean surface temperature, primarily attributed to human activities, especially the emission of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide2. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has provided extensive scientific reports that form the basis for international agreements like the Kyoto Protocol, aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions2. Numerous peer-reviewed studies have validated the IPCC's projections on climate change, reinforcing the scientific consensus that human activities are a significant driver of global warming2.
Perceived Scientific Agreement and Public Support
Public perception of scientific agreement on global warming significantly influences beliefs and support for government action to mitigate climate change. Studies have shown that when people perceive a high level of agreement among scientists, they are more likely to support policies aimed at reducing emissions3. This perception is crucial in countering misinformation campaigns that aim to create uncertainty about the reality and seriousness of anthropogenic climate change3.
Emotional and Psychological Factors
Influence of Discrete Emotions
Emotions play a critical role in shaping public support for global warming policies. Research indicates that emotions like worry, interest, and hope are strong predictors of support for climate change policies, even more so than cultural worldviews or sociodemographic factors1. These findings suggest that effective climate change communication should focus on eliciting these specific emotions to garner public support for necessary policy actions1.
Resistance to Persuasion
The emotional and cognitive foundations of resistance to persuasive information about global warming are complex. Anxiety can decrease resistance to persuasive arguments, making individuals more open to accepting information that contradicts their previous beliefs10. However, political sophistication can either strengthen or weaken this resistance, depending on the individual's level of anxiety and ideological identification10.
Public Opinion and Policy Support
Trends in Public Opinion
Over the past two decades, public opinion on global warming has been extensively studied. Surveys reveal varying levels of awareness, understanding, and concern about global warming among the public4. Public support for climate policies often hinges on the perceived economic costs and benefits, as well as the certainty of scientific evidence4. Despite fluctuations, there is a general trend towards increasing public concern and support for action against global warming4.
Communication Strategies
Effective communication is essential for increasing public conviction about the urgency of addressing global warming. The scientific community faces challenges in conveying the complex and uncertain nature of climate science to the public5. By understanding psychological phenomena related to decision-making under uncertainty, scientists can improve their communication strategies to ensure that the message of global warming is heard and acted upon5.
Conclusion
The arguments supporting global warming are robust and multifaceted, encompassing scientific consensus, emotional and psychological factors, and public opinion trends. The overwhelming evidence points to human activities as the primary cause of global warming, necessitating urgent policy actions to mitigate its impacts. Effective communication and public engagement are crucial in fostering support for these policies and addressing the global challenge of climate change.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
The Role of Emotion in Global Warming Policy Support and Opposition
Distinct emotions, such as worry, interest, and hope, play a stronger role in public support for global warming policy than cultural worldviews, negative affect, image associations, or sociodemographic variables.
Observational Study
Highly CitedThe Global Warming Debate: A Review of the State of Science
The global warming debate is complex and complex, with dissenting views emerging and future climate change projections based on insufficiently verified climate models.
Literature ReviewHighly CitedPerceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA
Misperception of scientific agreement on global warming leads to lower support for climate policy and beliefs that action should be taken to address it, with political orientation playing a significant role.
Highly CitedThe Polls—Trends Twenty Years of Public Opinion about Global Warming
Public awareness of global warming has increased, but public understanding of causes and policy debate has remained largely unchanged over the past 20 years.
Systematic ReviewHighly CitedThE PSyChOlOgy Of glOBAl WARMINg Improving the Fit between the Science and the Message
Climate scientists can improve public conviction on global warming by utilizing psychological research on complex uncertain problems and applying it to communication challenges faced by climate scientists.
Strategies for justifying counter-arguments in Q&A discussion
Counter-arguments in Q&A discussions on global warming are often justified by questioning answers' validity, background assumptions, emotional appeals, and questioning contributor's motives, mainly using internet-based information sources.
Response to Skeptics of Global Warming.
The majority of scientists agree that human activities significantly influence global climate change, and that addressing skeptics' arguments is crucial for addressing climate change and promoting sustainable development.
An Investigation of Student Engagement in a Global Warming Debate
Using debate as a pedagogical tool for global warming discussions promotes active learning, provides a realistic view of science, and integrates scientific, political, and social dimensions of global environmental change.
Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims
The conservative movement challenged global warming as a social problem by claiming the science was weak, benefits were substantial, and policies to combat it could cause more harm than good.
Highly CitedAnxiety, Sophistication, and Resistance to Persuasion: Evidence from a Quasi‐Experimental Survey on Global Climate Change
Anxiety reduces resistance to persuasion, while political sophistication strengthens it, with anxiety decreasing resistance and sophisticates less likely to resist when faced with arguments inconsistent with their beliefs.
Non-RCT
Large Human Trial