Be fast stroke
Searched over 200M research papers
Summary
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that the BEFAST mnemonic is more effective than FAST in recognizing acute ischemic stroke, improving detection rates and reducing missed cases.
Not enough predictions.
The Consensus Meter needs at least 5 yes/no predictions to display. Try asking a popular research question.
Research summarized with Copilot
Beta20 papers analyzed
Comparing FAST and BEFAST in Acute Stroke Recognition
Introduction to Stroke Recognition Mnemonics
Stroke is a medical emergency where timely recognition and treatment are crucial. Two primary mnemonics used for public education and early stroke detection are FAST (Face, Arm, Speech, Time) and BEFAST (Balance, Eyes, Face, Arm, Speech, Time). This article synthesizes research comparing the effectiveness of these mnemonics in identifying acute ischemic stroke.
FAST vs. BEFAST: Sensitivity and Specificity
FAST Mnemonic
The FAST mnemonic is widely endorsed and used in public health campaigns. It focuses on three primary symptoms: facial drooping, arm weakness, and speech difficulties, with an emphasis on the importance of time in seeking medical help. However, studies have shown that FAST can miss up to 14% of strokes, particularly those involving the posterior circulation .
BEFAST Mnemonic
The BEFAST mnemonic expands on FAST by including two additional symptoms: balance issues and vision problems (eyes). This inclusion aims to capture strokes that FAST might miss. Research indicates that BEFAST has a higher diagnostic value compared to FAST. Specifically, BEFAST has a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.85, compared to FAST's sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.60. This suggests that BEFAST is more effective in identifying a broader range of stroke symptoms, particularly those related to posterior circulation strokes .
Public Education and Implementation
Adoption by Comprehensive Stroke Centers
A study analyzing the educational materials of US Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs) found that 58% of CSCs listed BEFAST, while 35% listed FAST. This indicates a growing preference for BEFAST in public education, particularly in regions like the western and southeastern United States . The consistency in public health messaging is crucial for effective stroke recognition and timely treatment.
Educational Programs
Educational programs targeting various demographics, such as middle school students and kindergarteners, have shown positive results in increasing awareness and knowledge of stroke symptoms. For instance, the FAST Stroke Prevention Educational Program for middle school students significantly improved their understanding of stroke signs and risk factors. Similarly, the FAST Heroes 112 initiative for kindergarteners uses engaging methods to teach young children about stroke symptoms, potentially leading to faster recognition and response in real-life scenarios.
In-Hospital Stroke Detection
BEFAST has also proven to be a sensitive tool for detecting in-hospital acute ischemic strokes. A study found that BEFAST had a sensitivity of 85% for diagnosing acute ischemic stroke among inpatients, which increased to 92% when considering patients with an intact level of consciousness. This highlights BEFAST's utility not only in prehospital settings but also within hospital environments.
Conclusion
The BEFAST mnemonic offers a more comprehensive approach to stroke recognition compared to FAST, particularly in identifying posterior circulation strokes. Its higher sensitivity and specificity make it a valuable tool in both public education and clinical settings. As more stroke centers and educational programs adopt BEFAST, the potential for timely and accurate stroke diagnosis increases, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
