Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
Some studies suggest blood biomarkers like brain natriuretic peptide, MMP-9, D-dimer, and glial fibrillary acidic protein show potential in diagnosing stroke within 24 hours, while other studies highlight limitations in sensitivity, specificity, and study design, preventing their recommendation for clinical practice.
20 papers analyzed
Stroke is a critical medical condition requiring rapid diagnosis and treatment to minimize brain damage and improve patient outcomes. Traditional imaging techniques like CT and MRI are essential but may not always be immediately available or conclusive, especially in the early stages of ischemic stroke. Consequently, there is a growing interest in identifying blood biomarkers that can aid in the rapid diagnosis and differentiation of stroke types.
Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) have shown significant potential in differentiating ischemic stroke from intracerebral hemorrhage and stroke mimics. These biomarkers can be detected within 24 hours of symptom onset, providing a critical time window for early intervention.
Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is another promising biomarker that can differentiate ischemic stroke from intracerebral hemorrhage within six hours of symptom onset. This rapid differentiation is crucial for determining the appropriate treatment pathway, such as thrombolytic therapy, which is contraindicated in hemorrhagic stroke .
A panel including S100β, VCAM, and vWF has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in identifying acute cerebral ischemia. These markers are associated with glial activation, inflammation, and thrombosis, respectively, and can be used to predict stroke with a sensitivity and specificity of 90%.
Autoantibodies to NR2A/2B, a subtype of NMDA receptors, have been identified as sensitive markers for transient ischemic attack (TIA) and ischemic stroke. These autoantibodies can distinguish cerebral ischemia from intracerebral hemorrhage with high sensitivity and specificity, making them valuable in both emergency and routine clinical settings.
A combination of RBP-4 and NT-proBNP has shown promise in identifying ischemic stroke with 100% specificity. When combined with GFAP, this panel can identify a significant proportion of ischemic stroke cases, even in the presence of stroke mimics.
Despite the promising results, the clinical application of these biomarkers faces several challenges. The heterogeneity of stroke etiology, the complexity of the ischemic cascade, and the impact of the blood-brain barrier on biomarker diffusion complicate the development of universally reliable tests. Additionally, pre-analytical and analytical issues, as well as the quality of assays, need to be addressed to ensure accurate and reproducible results.
Blood biomarkers offer a promising avenue for the rapid diagnosis and differentiation of stroke types, potentially improving patient outcomes through timely and appropriate treatment. While several biomarkers such as BNP, MMP-9, GFAP, and autoantibodies to NMDA receptors have shown significant potential, further research and clinical trials are necessary to validate their efficacy and integrate them into routine clinical practice.
Most relevant research papers on this topic