Searched over 200M research papers for "cancer months"
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that shorter chemotherapy durations (3 months) can be as effective as longer durations (6 months) for certain cancers, with reduced toxicity and better quality of life, although some specific subgroups may benefit more from longer treatments.
20 papers analyzed
Research has identified several consistent prognostic factors associated with a median survival of six months or less in advanced cancer patients. These factors include decreasing performance status, advancing age, weight loss, metastatic disease, disease recurrence, and laboratory abnormalities indicating extensive disease. Despite the varied characteristics of different cancers, these indicators are universally significant in predicting terminal stages.
The effectiveness of treatments at these terminal stages is limited. Studies show that there is little evidence that treatment significantly prolongs survival for patients with a median survival of six months or less. Moreover, treatments at this stage often come with increased risks of toxicity.
Several studies have compared the efficacy and safety of 3-month versus 6-month adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer. The SCOT trial demonstrated that 3-month adjuvant chemotherapy is non-inferior to the traditional 6-month regimen in terms of disease-free survival for patients with high-risk stage II and III colorectal cancer. The 3-month regimen also resulted in fewer adverse events, particularly sensory neuropathy, and was more cost-effective .
Further analyses, such as those from the IDEA France trial, indicate that while 3-month regimens are generally effective, the non-inferiority is more pronounced in patients treated with CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) compared to FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin). For patients with lower-risk profiles (T1-3N1), 3-month therapy was as effective as 6-month therapy. However, for higher-risk patients (T4 and/or N2), the 6-month regimen showed superior disease-free survival rates .
In high-risk stage II colorectal cancer, the TOSCA trial found that 3-month adjuvant chemotherapy was less toxic but did not achieve non-inferiority in 5-year relapse-free survival compared to the 6-month regimen. However, a regimen effect was observed, suggesting that 3 months of CAPOX or 6 months of FOLFOX could be viable options depending on the patient's specific risk factors.
A systematic review of phase III chemotherapy studies in advanced pancreatic cancer revealed a significant 3-month mortality rate of 23.3%. This high early mortality rate is hypothesized to be due to under-reported vascular thromboembolic events, rather than solely progressive cancer or treatment-related deaths. This suggests a need for better thromboprophylaxis in future trials.
A study on the trajectory of performance status and symptom scores in cancer patients during the last six months of life found that performance status declines gradually, with a more rapid decline in the last month. Symptoms such as shortness of breath, drowsiness, well-being, lack of appetite, and tiredness increased in severity over time, particularly in the final month. This highlights the importance of symptom management in palliative care.
Recent research underscores the complexity of cancer treatment durations and their impact on patient outcomes. While shorter adjuvant chemotherapy regimens can be as effective as longer ones for certain colorectal cancer patients, the choice of regimen and patient-specific factors play crucial roles. In advanced cancers, particularly pancreatic cancer, early mortality remains a significant challenge, potentially linked to thromboembolic events. Understanding these dynamics is essential for optimizing treatment strategies and improving patient quality of life.
Most relevant research papers on this topic