Cancer websites
Searched over 200M research papers for "cancer websites"
Summary
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that while cancer websites offer valuable information and support, they need improvements in comprehensiveness, usability, navigation, translation capabilities, and integration with medical guidance to better meet patients' needs.
Not a yes or no question
To use the Consensus Meter, try asking a simple yes or no question
Research summarized with Copilot
Beta20 papers analyzed
Evaluating Cancer Websites: Information Provision, Trust, and Accessibility
Information Comprehensiveness on Cancer Websites
Cancer-specific websites are crucial for providing patients with the information they need to understand their diagnosis, treatment options, and future planning. A study evaluating breast and prostate cancer websites found that while biomedical questions were well-addressed, topics such as "future planning," "monitoring," and "decision-making" were often inadequately covered. This indicates a significant gap in the comprehensiveness of information provided, suggesting that these websites need to expand their content to better meet patient needs.
Social Media and Dedicated Websites for Cancer Information
The National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) sites have a varied presence on social media and dedicated websites. Only a fraction of these sites maintain a distinct online presence, with some utilizing platforms like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram to disseminate information about clinical trials and provider details. Despite the potential for these platforms to enhance patient engagement and information dissemination, the correlation between social media presence and funding was not statistically significant, indicating that more research is needed to understand the impact of these digital tools on patient outcomes.
Quality and Navigation of Cancer Clinical Trial Websites
An empirical review of cancer clinical trial (CCT) websites revealed a wide range in the quality and navigability of these resources. While some websites are beneficial for patients and clinical investigators, others are difficult to navigate, lack confidentiality assurances, and raise concerns about cost and access. This diversity underscores the need for standardized guidelines to improve the usability and reliability of CCT websites.
Trust in Online Cancer Information
Trust in online cancer information varies significantly among patients. A systematic review found that approximately half of cancer patients trust online cancer information, with younger, more educated, and female patients being more likely to trust these sources. This highlights the importance of ensuring that online cancer information is credible and trustworthy to support informed decision-making among patients.
Growth of Integrative Medicine Information
Leading cancer centers in the United States have increasingly included integrative medicine therapies on their websites. Common therapies mentioned include exercise, acupuncture, meditation, yoga, and nutrition consultations. This growth reflects a response to patient demand for holistic treatment options and indicates a trend towards more comprehensive care information being available online.
Translation Capabilities of Cancer Websites
The availability of translated information on cancer websites is crucial for patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). A study of NCI-designated cancer center websites found that only a small percentage offered information in languages other than English, with Spanish being the most common. This lack of translation services represents a barrier to care for LEP patients, emphasizing the need for more inclusive language resources.
General Cancer Information and Patient Support
Cancer websites offer a variety of information and support, including general cancer information, clinical trial details, and patient support groups. However, the quality and accessibility of this information can vary widely . Websites like the newly launched Azalea project in Italy aim to provide validated, easy-to-understand information in the local language, demonstrating a model for improving patient empowerment and information accessibility.
Conclusion
Cancer websites play a vital role in providing patients with necessary information and support. However, there are significant gaps in the comprehensiveness, quality, and accessibility of the information provided. Enhancing the content, usability, and translation capabilities of these websites can help meet the diverse needs of cancer patients, ultimately supporting better health outcomes and patient empowerment.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
