Criteria for alcoholism
Searched over 200M research papers
Research Analysis by Consensus
Beta · 19 papersConsensus Meter
Yes%
Possibly%
No%
Criteria for Alcoholism: A Comprehensive Overview
Diagnostic Criteria for Alcoholism
Pathophysiological and Behavioral Indicators
Alcoholism diagnosis often relies on identifying pathophysiological signs rather than behavioral or psychological changes. A study reviewing medical records of general hospital patients found that pathophysiological indications were more frequently recorded than behavioral changes, highlighting a gap in patient interviewing and medical record-keeping practices. This suggests that improving the diagnostic efficacy of alcoholism may require better documentation and education for healthcare providers.
Concordance Among Diagnostic Systems
Three major diagnostic systems—Feighner criteria, Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC), and DSM III—show substantial agreement in diagnosing alcoholism. A study involving 484 blue-collar workers found that 86% of the men received the same diagnosis across all three systems. However, discrepancies were noted, particularly with DSM III diagnosing heavy drinkers without attendant problems as alcoholics, which was not the case with Feighner criteria. This indicates a need for careful consideration of diagnostic criteria to avoid over-diagnosis.
DSM-IV Criteria for Alcohol Abuse
The DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse include problems in role functioning, hazardous use, legal issues, and social or interpersonal problems. A study evaluating these criteria found that endorsing even one criterion was associated with higher rates of alcohol and drug intake and related problems. The study concluded that the four DSM-IV criteria performed well in predicting future problems, supporting the use of a threshold of one criterion for diagnosis.
Subgrouping Alcoholics: Type 1 and Type 2
Different methods for identifying type 1 and type 2 alcoholism show varying levels of agreement. A study comparing three sets of criteria found good agreement between two of the methods but poor agreement with the third. Additionally, there was significant overlap between type 1/type 2 classifications and primary/secondary alcoholism classifications, suggesting that age-at-onset factors play a crucial role in these subgroupings.
Harmful Dysfunction Model
The Harmful Dysfunction (HD) model proposes revised criteria for alcohol use disorder (AUD) to improve diagnostic validity. Compared to DSM-5, the HD criteria yielded lower prevalence rates and higher levels of service use, severity, and family history of alcohol problems. This model also reduced the misdiagnosis of teenage transient drinkers, indicating its potential for more accurate diagnosis.
Empirical Evaluation of N.C.A. Criteria
The National Council on Alcoholism (N.C.A.) criteria were evaluated for their utility in diagnosing alcoholism. The study found that while the criteria correctly identified all known alcoholics, they also diagnosed a significant percentage of controls as alcoholics. This suggests that some criteria may not effectively discriminate between alcoholics and non-alcoholics, highlighting the need for refinement.
Genetic Insights from GWAS
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified genetic variations associated with alcohol dependence. Notably, variations in the ADH1B gene were linked to multiple phenotypes of alcohol dependence. These findings suggest that studying individual criteria may provide new insights into the genetic etiology of alcohol dependence.
Multidimensional Typologies
Empirically derived typologies suggest the existence of several homogeneous types of alcoholism, including chronic/severe, depressed/anxious, mildly affected, and antisocial types. These typologies can be valuable for investigating etiological pathways, treatment effectiveness, and the long-term course of alcohol use disorders.
Conclusion
The criteria for diagnosing alcoholism are multifaceted, involving pathophysiological, behavioral, and genetic factors. While traditional diagnostic systems like DSM and RDC show substantial agreement, newer models like the Harmful Dysfunction model offer improved validity. Empirical studies and genetic research continue to refine our understanding, aiming for more accurate and effective diagnostic criteria.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic