Does electronic voting lead to fraud?
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Consensus Meter
Does Electronic Voting Lead to Fraud?
Security Concerns in Electronic Voting Systems
Electronic voting systems, while offering potential benefits such as increased efficiency and accessibility, are fraught with significant security concerns. One of the primary issues is the inherent difficulty in creating a secure online voting system. Even well-tested platforms can harbor critical security vulnerabilities for years, as evidenced by recent state-level attacks and flaws discovered by Google. The unique requirements of elections, such as maintaining voter anonymity and preventing vote tampering, present challenges that current online voting technologies have yet to adequately address.
Multifactor Authentication and Fraud Prevention
To combat potential fraud, some electronic voting systems incorporate multifactor authentication (MFA). For instance, a proposed system in India uses multiple layers of verification, including voter ID cards, to prevent multiple votes by the same person. Similarly, another system integrates fingerprint and face recognition technology to enhance security and reduce the likelihood of fraudulent voting. These methods aim to ensure that only authorized voters can cast their votes, thereby maintaining the integrity of the election process .
Blockchain Technology in E-Voting
Blockchain technology has emerged as a promising solution to enhance the security and transparency of electronic voting systems. By storing voter information and aggregate data in a decentralized manner, blockchain can mitigate the risks associated with central server-based systems. An Ethereum-based electronic voting system, for example, has been developed to address issues of fraudulent voting by leveraging the decentralized and tamper-proof nature of blockchain. Blockchain-enabled e-voting (BEV) systems use encrypted keys and tamper-proof personal IDs to further reduce the risk of voter fraud and increase voter access.
Public Perception and Confidence in E-Voting
Despite technological advancements, public confidence in electronic voting remains a significant hurdle. Research indicates that voters, particularly in developed democracies, are generally less confident in electronic voting systems compared to traditional methods. Concerns about election fraud involving electronic voting are prevalent, especially among older individuals and those in politically polarized environments. This lack of confidence underscores the need for transparent and verifiable voting processes to ensure public trust in electoral outcomes.
Conclusion
While electronic voting systems offer potential benefits, they also pose significant risks related to security and voter confidence. Multifactor authentication and blockchain technology present promising solutions to mitigate these risks, but public perception remains a critical challenge. Ensuring the integrity and transparency of electronic voting systems is essential to maintaining trust in the democratic process.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic