Does homeopathy work?
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Consensus Meter
The Effectiveness of Homeopathy: An Analysis of Current Research
Introduction to Homeopathy and Its Principles
Homeopathy, a form of complementary and alternative medicine, was developed by Samuel Hahnemann in the late 18th century. It is based on the principle of "like cures like," where substances that produce symptoms in a healthy person are used in diluted forms to treat similar symptoms in a sick person. Despite its widespread use, homeopathy remains a highly controversial topic, with debates centering on its scientific plausibility and clinical effectiveness.
Comparative Effectiveness of Homeopathy and Conventional Medicine
A significant study comparing homeopathy and conventional medicine in primary care settings found that homeopathy could be as effective as conventional treatments for certain conditions. In this study, patients with upper respiratory tract complaints, lower respiratory tract complaints, and ear complaints were treated with either homeopathy or conventional medicine. The results showed that 82.6% of patients treated with homeopathy reported major improvement or were cured, compared to 68% of those treated with conventional medicine. Additionally, adverse events were less frequent in the homeopathy group (7.8%) compared to the conventional medicine group (22.3%).
Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews on Homeopathy
Meta-analyses and systematic reviews provide mixed results on the effectiveness of homeopathy. One meta-analysis indicated that homeopathy had a significant effect beyond placebo, but the results were highly sensitive to the subset of trials analyzed. The overall odds ratio (OR) for homeopathy was 0.76, suggesting a modest effect, but this varied significantly depending on the trials included. Another systematic review concluded that there was no strong evidence to support homeopathy's effectiveness over placebo for any specific condition.
Homeopathy in Specific Conditions
Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Research on homeopathy for ADHD has not shown significant treatment effects. A review of studies involving individualized and clinical homeopathy for ADHD found no substantial improvement in global symptoms, core symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity, or related outcomes such as anxiety.
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A study on the use of homeopathy as an add-on therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC showed promising results. Patients receiving homeopathic treatment alongside conventional cancer therapy reported significant improvements in quality of life and longer median survival times compared to those receiving placebo or no homeopathic treatment.
Theoretical Explanations and Scientific Plausibility
The scientific community remains skeptical about homeopathy due to the high dilutions used, which often exceed Avogadro's number, implying that no molecules of the original substance remain. Some researchers propose that homeopathy might work through mechanisms such as the "memory of water" or quantum entanglement, but these theories lack robust experimental evidence. The complexity and variability in homeopathic practices further complicate the establishment of a uniform standard for clinical research .
Conclusion
The effectiveness of homeopathy remains a contentious issue. While some studies suggest that homeopathy can be as effective as conventional treatments for certain conditions and may offer benefits such as fewer adverse events, systematic reviews and meta-analyses generally do not support its efficacy beyond placebo. The scientific plausibility of homeopathy is also questioned due to the extreme dilutions used in its remedies. Further rigorous and well-designed studies are needed to clarify the potential benefits and mechanisms of homeopathy.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic