Dsm add
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers for "dsm add"
The Addition of Dimensional Measures to DSM Diagnoses: Implications for ADHD
Introduction to DSM and Dimensional Measures
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has traditionally utilized categorical diagnoses to classify mental health disorders. However, there is a growing consensus in the clinical and research communities that incorporating dimensional measures could enhance the reliability and validity of these diagnoses. This approach involves adding a dimensional adjunct to each traditional categorical diagnosis, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of mental health conditions1.
Historical Context and Theoretical Basis
The proposal to integrate dimensional measures into the DSM is not new. The advantages of dimensional over categorical measures have been recognized for some time. Dimensional measures can capture the severity and range of symptoms more effectively, providing a richer clinical picture1. This approach is particularly relevant for disorders like Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), where symptoms can vary widely in intensity and impact.
ADHD: A Case for Dimensional Measures
Unidimensional vs. Multidimensional Definitions
The DSM-III-R provided a unidimensional definition of ADHD, assuming that inattention, impulsivity, and motor hyperactivity were aspects of the same dimension. However, empirical studies have challenged this assumption. For instance, cluster analyses have identified distinct subgroups of patients: those with both inattention and hyperactivity, and those with inattention and sluggish tempo but not hyperactivity2. These findings suggest that a multidimensional approach could better capture the complexity of ADHD symptoms.
Family-Genetic and Psychosocial Risk Factors
Research has shown that family-genetic and psychosocial factors play a significant role in the development of ADHD. Studies have found higher morbidity risks for ADHD, antisocial disorders, and mood disorders among relatives of individuals with ADHD compared to psychiatric and normal controls3. These findings underscore the importance of considering a range of factors when diagnosing and treating ADHD.
Validity of ADHD Subtypes
The validity of differentiating ADHD into subtypes, such as Attention Deficit Disorder Without Hyperactivity (ADD/WO) and Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity (ADD/H), has been supported by factor analytic studies. These studies indicate two primary dimensions of maladjustment: inattention and disorganization, and motor hyperactivity and impulsive responding4. Children with ADD/WO exhibit different behavioral and social profiles compared to those with ADD/H, further supporting the need for a multidimensional diagnostic approach4 7.
Evolution of ADHD Diagnostic Criteria
The evolution of ADHD diagnostic criteria from DSM-III to DSM-IV reflects a shift towards a more nuanced understanding of the disorder. The DSM-IV criteria recognize predominantly inattentive and combined types, which correspond closely to the DSM-III subtypes of ADD/WO and ADD/H, respectively5. This shift highlights the importance of a multidimensional conceptualization of ADHD, which can better inform treatment and intervention strategies.
Conclusion
The integration of dimensional measures into the DSM represents a significant advancement in the field of mental health diagnostics. For disorders like ADHD, where symptoms and their impacts can vary widely, a multidimensional approach offers a more comprehensive understanding. This approach not only enhances diagnostic accuracy but also informs more tailored and effective treatment strategies. As the DSM continues to evolve, the inclusion of dimensional measures will likely play a crucial role in improving mental health outcomes.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
DSM categories and dimensions in clinical and research contexts
Adding dimensional adjuncts to traditional categorical diagnoses in the DSM-V could enhance the reliability and validity of mental disorder diagnoses.
Highly CitedDimensions and types of attention deficit disorder.
The DSM-III-R unidimensional definition of ADHD is not supported by empirical findings, as three distinct clusters were identified: those without ADD, those with both inattention and hyperactivity, and those with inattention and sluggish tempo but no hyperactivity.
Observational StudyHighly CitedFamily-genetic and psychosocial risk factors in DSM-III attention deficit disorder.
Relatives of children with attention deficit disorder (ADD) have a higher risk of developing ADD, antisocial disorders, and mood disorders compared to psychiatric and normal controls.
Observational StudyHighly CitedValidity of the Diagnostic Category of Attention Deficit Disorder Without Hyperactivity
The diagnostic category of Attention Deficit Disorder Without Hyperactivity (ADD/WO) is valid and differentiates children with inattention and disorganization from those with hyperactivity and anxiety disorders.
Observational StudyHighly CitedValidity of DSM-IV ADHD predominantly inattentive and combined types: relationship to previous DSM diagnoses/subtype differences.
DSM-IV ADHD criteria closely correspond to previous DSM-III diagnoses, supporting a multidimensional conceptualization of ADHD.
Observational StudyHighly CitedRetrospective assessment of DSM-III attention deficit disorder in nonreferred individuals.
Childhood attention deficit disorder (ADD) is highly prevalent in first-degree relatives of children with ADD, and is associated with a higher risk of antisocial disorders.
Observational StudyThe Social Functioning Of Children With ADD With Hyperactivity And ADD Without Hyperactivity
Children with Attention-deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity (ADD/H) and ADD/WO show different social deficits, highlighting the need for targeted interventions and research.
Highly CitedAn evaluation of the validity of the diagnostic category of attention deficit disorder.
ADD is an inadequately specified diagnostic category, as it cannot be predicted from scores on widely used psychometric and behavioral instruments.
Observational StudyHighly CitedSeparation of DSM-III attention deficit disorder and conduct disorder: evidence from a family-genetic study of American child psychiatric patients.
ADD and antisocial disorders may be distinct disorders, but their familial risk patterns suggest a continuum of increasing familial factors and severity of illness.
Highly CitedPrevalence and correlates of the proposed DSM-5 diagnosis of Chronic Depressive Disorder.
Chronic depression is highly prevalent among community-residing individuals and has significant correlates distinguishing it from non-chronic depression, warranting the proposed DSM-5 diagnosis of Chronic Depressive Disorder.
Observational Study
Rigorous JournalHighly Cited