Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
Some studies suggest ability grouping positively impacts academic performance, particularly in elementary grades and specific subjects, while other studies indicate negligible or mixed effects, especially in secondary schools and for low-ability students.
20 papers analyzed
The effect of ability grouping on academic performance has been a topic of extensive research and debate. Ability grouping, also known as tracking, involves organizing students into groups based on their academic abilities. This synthesis examines the impact of different forms of ability grouping on students' academic achievement, drawing on findings from multiple research studies.
Positive Effects of Within-Class and Cross-Grade Grouping:
Limited or No Benefit from Between-Class Grouping:
Impact on Different Ability Levels:
Effectiveness in Specific Subjects:
Impact on Self-Esteem and Self-Concept:
Heterogeneous vs. Homogeneous Grouping:
Long-Term Effects and Contextual Factors:
The research on ability grouping presents a nuanced picture. While within-class and cross-grade grouping can enhance academic performance, especially for high-ability students, between-class grouping shows limited benefits. The impact of ability grouping varies by subject and student ability level, with high-ability students generally benefiting more. Additionally, the context in which ability grouping is implemented, such as school characteristics and the specific grouping method used, plays a crucial role in determining its effectiveness. Overall, ability grouping can be beneficial, but its implementation needs to be carefully considered to avoid potential negative effects on low-ability students.
Most relevant research papers on this topic