Effect of State-Owned Enterprise Control on Capital Structure
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Consensus Meter
Effect of State-Owned Enterprise Control on Capital Structure
Executive Control Rights and Capital Structure in State-Owned Enterprises
State-owned enterprises (SOEs) exhibit unique capital structure dynamics influenced by executive control rights. Research indicates that higher executive control rights in SOEs lead to a lower debt ratio and long-term liability ratio. This is particularly evident when executives hold dual roles as both chairman of the board and CEO, which weakens the independence of the board of directors and reduces the effectiveness of supervisory boards. Additionally, factors such as top management holding shares and long CEO tenures further constrain executive control rights, prompting executives to prefer lower leverage to maintain their power.
State Control and Capital Allocation
State control significantly impacts capital allocation and investment decisions within SOEs. In China, state firms are more likely to receive government approval for seasoned equity offerings compared to non-state firms. This preferential treatment distorts resource allocation, leading to underinvestment in non-state firms due to financial constraints. Consequently, non-state firms exhibit greater sensitivity to regulatory decisions on stock issuances, affecting their subsequent investment and stock performance more than state firms.
Corporate Governance and Capital Structure
The relationship between corporate governance and capital structure in SOEs is complex. High proportions of state-owned stock and suboptimal capital market conditions negatively affect corporate governance. To improve the situation, it is suggested to reduce the proportion of state-owned stock, optimize the capital market, and promote stock right pluralism. These measures aim to enhance the governance and capital structure of SOEs, fostering a more balanced and efficient financial environment.
Equity Division Reform and Capital Structure Regulation
SOEs often face issues such as high liability and low equity capital properties. The equity division reform is a critical measure to address these problems. By introducing reforms that adjust the balance between liabilities and equity, SOEs can achieve a more stable and efficient capital structure. This reform is essential for mitigating the risks associated with high leverage and ensuring sustainable financial health.
Fiscal Autonomy and Capital Structure Adjustment
Fiscal autonomy plays a crucial role in the capital structure adjustment of SOEs. High financial autonomy reduces the impact of monetary contraction on downward capital structure adjustments. However, this autonomy can also lead to overinvestment, as SOEs with greater fiscal independence tend to adjust their capital structure more slowly. This slow adjustment process can hinder the overall financial efficiency and performance of SOEs.
State Laws and Capital Structure
State laws also influence the capital structure of firms, including SOEs. For instance, firms in states with stronger payout restrictions tend to use less debt. Conversely, state antitakeover laws do not significantly reduce long-term leverage but are associated with higher debt as a fraction of market value due to lower market values for these firms. These legal constraints partially explain the negative relationship between profitability and leverage in firms that have not reincorporated outside their home states.
State Capital Participation and Firm Performance
Empirical studies show that state equity participation and additional paid-in capital do not significantly affect the financial and non-financial performance of SOEs. This lack of impact suggests that other factors may play a more critical role in determining the performance outcomes of SOEs. Therefore, strategic policies should consider these influencing factors to ensure that state capital participation positively influences both financial and non-financial performance.
Capital Structure and Firm Performance in Vietnam
In Vietnam, the capital structure has a statistically significant negative effect on firm performance, with this effect being more pronounced in state-owned enterprises compared to non-state enterprises. This finding highlights the need for SOEs to carefully manage their capital structure to improve performance metrics such as return on equity (ROE), return on assets (ROA), and earnings per share (EPS).
Conclusion
The control exerted by state ownership significantly influences the capital structure of SOEs. Factors such as executive control rights, state control over capital allocation, corporate governance, fiscal autonomy, and state laws all play crucial roles in shaping the financial strategies and performance of these enterprises. Understanding these dynamics is essential for policymakers and managers aiming to optimize the capital structure and enhance the overall efficiency and performance of state-owned enterprises.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic