Is there evidence supporting efficacy of social prescribing?
Searched over 200M research papers
Research Analysis by Consensus
Consensus Meter
Introduction
Social prescribing (SP) is an approach that aims to address patients' non-medical needs by linking them with community-based support and activities. It is increasingly being integrated into primary care to improve health and well-being, particularly for those with chronic conditions, mental health issues, and social isolation. This synthesis examines the evidence supporting the efficacy of social prescribing.
Key Insights
-
Positive Effects on Well-being and Mental Health:
- SP interventions have shown improvements in mental health, general health, and quality of life, particularly through the link worker model and community referrals .
- Statistically significant improvements in mental health outcomes, such as reduced anxiety and depression, have been reported in several studies .
-
Increased Physical Activity:
- SP exercise interventions have been found to slightly increase physical activity levels among participants, although the benefits for metabolic factors like blood pressure and glucose levels were not significant.
-
Social Connectedness and Support:
- SP has been associated with increased social connectedness and support, which in turn improves quality of life and reduces feelings of loneliness .
- The sustained and flexible relationship between service users and Wellbeing Coordinators is a key factor in the success of SP interventions.
-
Mixed Evidence on Health Care Utilization:
- Some studies suggest that SP may reduce future access to primary care, although the evidence is inconclusive .
- There is limited quantitative evidence supporting a decrease in health service use, despite perceptions of reduced workload among general practitioners .
-
Need for Rigorous Research:
- The current evidence base is mixed and often methodologically weak, with many studies having a high risk of bias and lacking control groups .
- Further rigorous, controlled trials are needed to determine the long-term effectiveness and sustainability of SP interventions .
Conclusion
The evidence suggests that social prescribing can positively impact mental health, well-being, and social connectedness. However, its effects on physical health and healthcare utilization are less clear. The current body of research is limited by methodological weaknesses, indicating a need for more robust studies to fully understand the efficacy and mechanisms of social prescribing.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic