Genetic engineering controversy
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Genetic Engineering Controversy: Ethical, Social, and Scientific Perspectives
Introduction to Genetic Engineering Controversy
Genetic engineering, particularly in humans, has been a subject of intense debate since its inception. The first recombinant genetic engineering experiments on humans in 1980 sparked a major international controversy, highlighting the profound implications for genetic science and society1. This article explores the multifaceted controversy surrounding genetic engineering, focusing on ethical concerns, public perception, and scientific challenges.
Ethical Concerns in Genetic Engineering
Ethical Dilemmas and Germline Editing
The ethical concerns surrounding genetic engineering are significant, especially when it comes to germline editing. The birth of twins in China with edited genomes to increase resistance to HIV raised global ethical alarms. These germline modifications were considered illicit due to potential risks to the children and future generations3 5. The ethical debate extends to the autonomy of future generations, who cannot consent to genetic modifications made before their birth6.
Safety and Off-Target Effects
Safety is a paramount concern in genetic engineering. Technologies like CRISPR-Cas9, while revolutionary, carry risks of off-target effects and potential carcinogenic growths5. The burden of proof for safety is particularly high for germline cell therapy, which could affect not just the individual but their progeny as well5 6.
Public Perception and Risk Perception
Public Attitudes Towards Genetic Engineering
Public perception of genetic engineering varies significantly depending on the application. Research indicates that genetic engineering in food production is perceived as riskier and less beneficial compared to medical applications2. Ethical and risk-related objections are more pronounced when genetic engineering involves food, particularly when it involves transferring genetic material between dissimilar organisms2.
Need for Regulation
The public's demand for legislative control over genetic engineering is driven by both risk-related and ethical concerns. There is a greater call for regulation to address perceived risks, although ethical considerations also play a crucial role2. This highlights the need for a balanced approach to regulation that addresses both safety and ethical issues.
Scientific Challenges and Advances
Technological Advances and Accessibility
Technological advancements, particularly CRISPR-Cas9, have significantly improved the accuracy and feasibility of genome editing. These advancements have made genetic engineering more accessible by lowering costs and increasing usability3 5. However, these same advancements have also led to increased instances of "rogue science," where ethical guidelines are bypassed5.
Therapeutic Potential and Ethical Implications
Genetic engineering holds immense therapeutic potential, offering possibilities for curing genetic diseases and enhancing human capabilities. However, this potential comes with ethical implications that must be carefully considered. The scientific community is divided on whether research in this field should be encouraged or prohibited due to the unknown and potentially problematic implications4 6.
Conclusion
The controversy surrounding genetic engineering is complex, involving ethical, social, and scientific dimensions. While the technology offers unprecedented opportunities for medical advancements, it also poses significant ethical and safety challenges. A balanced approach that includes robust ethical guidelines, public engagement, and stringent regulatory frameworks is essential to navigate the future of genetic engineering responsibly. The ongoing debate underscores the need for a global dialogue to achieve a broad social consensus on the ethical use of genetic engineering technologies.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
…Let No One Split Asunder: Controversy In Human Genetic Engineering
Human genetic engineering controversy highlights the importance of understanding science as a social process with diverse implications and meanings, as seen through four perspectives (substantive, network, organizational, and societal).
Ethical concerns and risk perceptions associated with different applications of genetic engineering: Interrelationships with the perceived need for regulation of the technology
Public perception of genetic engineering is more risky and less beneficial for food production than medicine, with greater ethical and risk-related objections, and a greater need for legislative control.
Highly CitedGenetic Engineering - Programmable Humans
Genetic engineering is a controversial topic, with both proponents and opponents arguing for its ethical, safety, and medical necessity.
Genetic Engineering
Genetic engineering has potential therapeutic applications, but ethical considerations must be made regarding potential risks and ethical implications.
Advances in Genetic Editing of the Human Embryo
The ethics of human embryo gene editing should be based on global dialogue, public involvement, and a broad social consensus to achieve a rational acceptance of this technology.
Systematic ReviewA prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification
A framework for open discourse on the use of CRISPR-Cas9 technology to manipulate the human genome is urgently needed to ensure safety and ethical application of this technology.
Highly CitedPrinciples of Genetic Engineering
Genetic engineering uses various methods to modify DNA sequences, with CRISPR/Cas9 technology being the most widely applied method, and evolving technologies continue to revolutionize research in various fields.
Rigorous JournalGenetic Engineering
Genetic engineering involves transferring selected genetic code (DNA) from one organism to another organism's cells, altering their biological traits for desired traits, such as increased yield or resistance to certain diseases.
Highly Cited