Genetically engineered people
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Genetically Engineered People: Ethical, Medical, and Environmental Considerations
Ethical Concerns of Genetic Engineering in Humans
The ethical implications of genetically engineered humans have been a topic of intense debate. Bill McKibben's book "Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age" argues that genetic enhancement and cloning could lead to significant psychological harm. McKibben suggests that individuals who know they were genetically engineered might struggle with personal responsibility and self-worth, questioning whether their achievements are truly their own or a result of their engineered traits3. This concern highlights the potential for a crisis in identity and self-perception among genetically engineered individuals.
Medical Applications: Genetically Engineered T Cells and Cancer Therapy
Genetic engineering has shown promising applications in the field of medicine, particularly in cancer treatment. Genetically engineered T cells, equipped with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) or T cell receptors (TCRs), have demonstrated significant efficacy in treating certain hematological malignancies. These engineered T cells enhance the body's immune response by specifically targeting cancer cells, leading to notable successes in some patients6. For instance, the adoptive transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes has resulted in objective cancer regression in patients with metastatic melanoma, showcasing the therapeutic potential of this approach4.
Genetically Engineered Mouse Models in Cancer Research
Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) have become indispensable tools in oncology research. Unlike traditional cancer cell inoculation models, GEMMs develop tumors in a natural, immune-proficient environment, closely mimicking human cancer's histopathological and molecular features. These models are crucial for validating cancer genes, assessing drug efficacy, and understanding the tumor microenvironment. Advances in genetic engineering have further refined GEMMs, accelerating the development of new cancer therapies and their translation into clinical practice2.
Environmental Risks of Genetically Engineered Organisms
The release of genetically engineered organisms into natural or semi-natural environments poses potential ecological risks. While most engineered organisms are designed to thrive under controlled conditions, introducing new traits into wild populations could lead to unpredictable evolutionary outcomes. The artificial insertion of genetic traits might enhance an organism's fitness and competitiveness, potentially disrupting existing ecosystems. Identifying and mitigating these risks remains a significant challenge for scientists5.
Public Perception and Moral Opposition
Public attitudes toward genetic engineering, particularly in food, are often negative. Many people view genetically engineered food as dangerous and morally unacceptable, perceiving it as a violation of naturalness. This opposition is deeply rooted in the belief that nature is sacred and should not be tampered with. The concept of "sympathetic magical law of contagion" suggests that even minimal contact between natural food and an unnatural entity, such as foreign DNA, can render the food unacceptable to consume1.
Conclusion
The field of genetic engineering, especially concerning humans, is fraught with ethical, medical, and environmental challenges. While the medical applications, particularly in cancer therapy, show great promise, the ethical concerns and potential ecological risks cannot be overlooked. Public perception remains a significant barrier, driven by deep-seated moral beliefs about naturalness. As the technology advances, it is crucial to address these concerns through rigorous ethical scrutiny and robust regulatory frameworks.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic