Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that various glucose testing methods during pregnancy, such as OGTT, CGM, and SMBG, have different implications for maternal and infant outcomes, with no single method proving superior across all measures.
20 papers analyzed
Glucose testing during pregnancy is crucial for identifying gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and managing pre-existing diabetes. Various methods, including the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), are employed to monitor and manage glucose levels, ensuring maternal and neonatal health.
Research indicates that even a single abnormal value on the 3-hour, 100-g OGTT can significantly increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Women with one abnormal glucose value are at higher risk for macrosomia, large-for-gestational-age infants, neonatal hypoglycemia, cesarean delivery, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and low Apgar scores at 5 minutes. These outcomes are comparable to those seen in women diagnosed with GDM, highlighting the importance of monitoring and managing even isolated abnormal glucose values.
A systematic review comparing various blood glucose monitoring techniques for pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes found no clear superiority of one method over another. Techniques such as SMBG, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and clinic monitoring were evaluated, but the evidence was insufficient to determine the best approach due to small sample sizes and study design limitations . This underscores the need for more robust research to guide clinical practice.
CGM has shown potential benefits, such as reducing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and neonatal hypoglycemia, although it did not significantly reduce the incidence of pre-eclampsia or large-for-gestational-age infants. These findings suggest that while CGM may offer some advantages, its overall impact on pregnancy outcomes requires further investigation.
The 75-g, 2-hour OGTT is another method used to diagnose GDM. A study involving 3,505 pregnant women found a positive association between maternal glucose values and birth weight percentiles, although no clear glucose threshold values were identified for predicting macrosomia. This suggests that consensus criteria may be necessary to define GDM effectively.
SMBG can complement OGTT in identifying hyperglycemia during pregnancy. A study comparing OGTT and SMBG found that both methods were equally associated with increased neonatal complications, such as neonatal hypoglycemia. Interestingly, some women with normal OGTT results exhibited hyperglycemia in daily life, detected through SMBG. This indicates that SMBG could enhance the detection and management of hyperglycemia, potentially improving pregnancy outcomes.
OGTT-based measures of insulin secretory response, such as the Stumvoll first phase estimate and the insulin/glucose area under the curve (AUCins/AUCglu), have been validated for use in pregnancy. These measures correlate well with first-phase insulin response and can track longitudinal changes in insulin secretion, providing valuable insights for managing GDM.
Glucose testing during pregnancy, whether through OGTT, SMBG, or CGM, plays a critical role in identifying and managing GDM and pre-existing diabetes. While each method has its strengths, the choice of technique should be guided by individual patient needs and clinical judgment. Further research is essential to establish the most effective monitoring strategies to ensure optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Most relevant research papers on this topic