Has the big bang theory been disproven
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Has the Big Bang Theory Been Disproven?
Introduction to the Big Bang Theory
The Big Bang Theory has long been the prevailing cosmological model explaining the origin and expansion of the universe. It posits that the universe began as a singular, extremely hot and dense point approximately 13.8 billion years ago and has been expanding ever since. However, recent research and critiques have raised significant questions about the validity of this theory.
Criticisms and Alternative Theories
Granular Spacetime Sphere Theory
One of the notable challenges to the Big Bang Theory comes from the Granular Spacetime Sphere Theory. This theory suggests that the universe is composed of spheres within spheres, starting from a quasi-point particle and expanding into a multiverse. It claims to predict the gravitational constant through a rotating universe model, thereby disputing the Big Bang Theory's foundational principles1.
Philosophical and Observational Critiques
Critics argue that the Big Bang Theory is continually adjusted to fit new data, which some see as a weakness. They suggest that the theory's frequent modifications indicate it may not be the ultimate explanation of the universe's origins. Instead, they propose that the theory might eventually be falsified, similar to how Newton's theories are considered absolute truths within their finite regimes but not beyond2.
Observational Inconsistencies
Several researchers have pointed out that the Big Bang Theory lacks observational support. For instance, its predictions about light element abundances and the age of the universe do not align with current data. Additionally, the theory's requirement for an isotropic cosmic microwave background relies on assumptions that are contradicted by observations. Plasma cosmology, an alternative theory, is suggested to better explain these phenomena3.
The Huge Large Quasar Group (LQG)
The discovery of the Huge Large Quasar Group (LQG), a structure too large to have formed within the time frame allowed by the Big Bang Theory, presents another significant challenge. This finding suggests that either the universe is not expanding as the Big Bang Theory posits, or the redshift-distance relationship is incorrect, both of which would invalidate the Big Bang Theory6.
Accelerated Expansion and Dark Matter/Energy
The discovery of the universe's accelerated expansion in the 1990s further complicates the Big Bang Theory. This acceleration contradicts the theory's prediction of a decelerating expansion. Attempts to explain this phenomenon through dark matter and dark energy have not yielded satisfactory results, leading some to propose alternative explanations such as the theory of chain reactions8.
Conclusion
While the Big Bang Theory remains a cornerstone of modern cosmology, it faces substantial criticisms and challenges from various quarters. Alternative theories and observational inconsistencies suggest that the Big Bang may not be the definitive explanation of the universe's origins. As scientific inquiry progresses, it is possible that new models will emerge, providing a more accurate understanding of the cosmos.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic