Searched over 200M research papers for "hospital abbreviation"
4 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that hospital abbreviations are common and necessary but can pose safety risks if not standardized.
20 papers analyzed
Hospital environments are rife with abbreviations, forming a unique "abbreviated vocabulary" that new interns must quickly learn. This specialized jargon includes abbreviations of medical and scientific terms, as well as some that seem arbitrary but are widely used. A comprehensive list of these abbreviations has been compiled for educational purposes, highlighting the necessity for healthcare professionals to familiarize themselves with this terminology to ensure effective communication and patient care.
In resource-limited settings, such as district hospitals in Botswana, abbreviations and acronyms (A&A) are frequently used to streamline communication and save time. However, this practice can lead to patient safety issues due to the diverse understanding of these abbreviations among healthcare workers. A study found that while healthcare workers correctly identified 73% of the abbreviations, there was significant variability in understanding, with 58.1% of abbreviations having alternative meanings suggested by participants. This underscores the need for standardization of abbreviations to minimize risks and ensure clear communication in clinical care.
A comparative study of two tertiary hospitals in Cebu City, Philippines, revealed that abbreviations are prevalent in medical charts, including clinical history, physical examinations, and doctors' orders. Common abbreviations include universally accepted ones like "BP" (blood pressure) and non-universally accepted ones like "HFD" (heredofamilial disease). The use of potentially dangerous abbreviations, such as "d/c" (discharge or discontinue), was also noted. Abbreviations are used for convenience, to save time, and to maintain confidentiality. However, the inconsistent use and understanding of these abbreviations pose risks to patient safety. The study suggests that medical schools should standardize abbreviation usage and educate students on their potential dangers.
In the context of hospital functionality assessments, especially in scenarios like earthquakes, abbreviations are used to denote various technical terms and procedures. For instance, "CT" stands for Imaging Procedure, "OR" for Operation Room, and "HVAC" for Heating Ventilation and Air Conditions. These abbreviations help streamline communication among stakeholders and facilitate the assessment process. However, the reliance on such abbreviations necessitates a clear understanding among all involved parties to ensure accurate and effective communication during critical assessments.
The use of abbreviations in hospital settings is a double-edged sword. While they offer efficiency and convenience, they also pose significant risks if not standardized and universally understood. Studies from various settings highlight the need for standardization and education to mitigate potential dangers and enhance patient safety. As healthcare environments continue to evolve, the importance of clear and consistent communication through standardized abbreviations cannot be overstated.
Most relevant research papers on this topic