Searched over 200M research papers
5 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that fluoride can remain in enamel for up to 18 months, with significant effects observable within shorter periods depending on the application method and duration.
20 papers analyzed
Fluoride treatments are essential for enhancing dental health, but understanding the optimal waiting period after application is crucial for maximizing benefits. Research indicates that fluoride concentrations in enamel can vary significantly based on the type of fluoride used and the duration since application. For instance, a study examining fluoride concentrations in enamel biopsies from maxillary central incisors found that substantial amounts of calcium fluoride (CaF2) were present in enamel 6 weeks after treatment with ammonium fluoride (NH4F), with mean concentrations reaching 84,723 ppm. In contrast, sodium fluoride (NaF) treatment resulted in lower mean concentrations of 7,818 ppm. Even after 18 months, small amounts of fluoride persisted in the enamel, suggesting that fluoride can have long-lasting effects, although the increase in enamel fluoride was only marginally significant.
Different fluoride application protocols can influence the effectiveness and duration of fluoride retention. A clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of various topical fluoride applications in arresting dentine caries in preschool children found that annual or three consecutive weekly applications of 30% silver diammine fluoride (SDF) were more effective than three weekly applications of 5% NaF varnish. The caries arrest rates were 40%, 35%, and 27% for the respective groups over an 18-month period, indicating that SDF applications can shorten the time to arrest dentine caries compared to NaF.
The duration of fluoride mouthrinsing also plays a critical role in fluoride retention. A study on 4- to 5-year-old children found that fluoride retention in the mouth increased with longer rinsing times. Specifically, fluoride concentrations were higher after 20 seconds compared to 10 seconds, and significantly higher after 30 seconds compared to 10 seconds. However, no significant difference was observed between 20 and 30 seconds, suggesting that a 20-second rinse might be sufficient for effective fluoride retention.
The duration of brushing can significantly impact fluoride levels in dental biofilm fluid and saliva. A randomized clinical study involving children aged 4-5 years compared the effects of 40 seconds versus 2 minutes of brushing. The results showed that brushing for 2 minutes resulted in significantly higher fluoride concentrations in both saliva and biofilm fluid over a 1-hour period compared to 40 seconds of brushing. This suggests that longer brushing times enhance fluoride delivery and retention.
For patients with white spot lesions (WSL) following orthodontic treatment, the application of fluoride gel can influence oral health outcomes. A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial found that weekly applications of 1.25% fluoride gel over 6 months did not show a significant clinical effect on WSL or other oral health parameters, except for an increase in stimulated salivary flow rate in the fluoride group. This indicates that while fluoride application can have some benefits, its impact on WSL may be limited.
In summary, the optimal waiting period after fluoride treatment can vary based on the type of fluoride used and the application protocol. Substantial fluoride retention can be observed as early as 6 weeks and may persist for up to 18 months. Shorter rinsing times of 20 seconds can be effective, and longer brushing durations of 2 minutes are recommended for better fluoride retention. However, the clinical effects of post-orthodontic fluoride applications on white spot lesions may be limited. Understanding these factors can help in optimizing fluoride treatments for better dental health outcomes.
Most relevant research papers on this topic