Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
Some studies suggest intravenous iron treatments are frequently prescribed and effective for various conditions, while other studies highlight the continued use and challenges of oral iron formulations.
20 papers analyzed
Iron deficiency is a prevalent issue among children, particularly in low-income populations. A study conducted at Boston Medical Center revealed that 48% of children aged 8 to 18 months had abnormal ZPP levels, indicating iron deficiency. Among these children, those prescribed iron showed significant reductions in ZPP levels, especially those with anemia, suggesting that iron therapy is effective in improving iron status in pediatric patients.
In a study at the Gabriel Touré University Hospital in Mali, it was found that while most pediatric prescribers were aware of the importance of iron, there were significant gaps in prescription practices. Only 30% of patients received the correct dosage, and the duration of treatment was often not specified. This highlights the need for better training and adherence to guidelines to ensure effective iron supplementation in children.
In patients with IBD, intravenous (IV) iron has become more common due to its superior effectiveness and tolerance compared to oral iron. A Swiss cohort study showed a significant increase in IV iron prescriptions from 2006 to 2009, reflecting adherence to updated guidelines recommending IV iron for better management of iron deficiency in IBD patients. This shift is particularly notable in patients treated with steroids, immunomodulators, or anti-TNF drugs, who are more likely to receive iron supplements.
A study evaluating the financial impact of IV iron treatments in hospitalized patients found that while IV iron, particularly ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), is effective, it is also more expensive than alternatives like iron sucrose (IS). The study suggested that many prescriptions for FCM were not necessary and that using IS could reduce costs without compromising efficacy. Another study in a Swiss tertiary care hospital confirmed that while IV iron is recommended, oral iron remains the first-line therapy in many cases due to cost considerations.
In a plastic surgery department, a situational analysis revealed that iron saccharose hydroxide (ISH) was the most commonly prescribed form of iron, in line with local protocols. However, the average length of stay for patients often did not allow for the recommended administration schedule, indicating a need for protocol adjustments to better fit clinical practice.
Ferumoxytol, a novel IV iron product, has shown significant efficacy in treating iron deficiency anemia in CKD patients. Clinical trials demonstrated that ferumoxytol led to greater increases in hemoglobin levels compared to oral iron, with fewer treatment-related adverse events . This makes ferumoxytol a promising option for CKD patients, particularly those not on dialysis.
Long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) has been associated with an increased risk of iron deficiency due to reduced gastric acid production, which is essential for iron absorption. A case-control study found that patients using these medications for over two years had a significantly higher risk of developing iron deficiency, with the risk increasing with higher doses and longer duration of use. This underscores the importance of monitoring iron levels in patients on long-term acid-suppressing therapy.
Iron deficiency remains a significant health issue across various populations, from children to patients with chronic conditions like IBD and CKD. While iron supplementation, particularly IV iron, has proven effective, there are challenges related to prescription practices, cost, and adherence to guidelines. Addressing these challenges through better training, protocol adjustments, and careful monitoring can improve outcomes for patients with iron deficiency.
Most relevant research papers on this topic