Is 1200 calories enough
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Is 1200 Calories Enough? Analyzing the Impact of Low-Calorie Diets
Psychological and Biological Stress from Caloric Restriction
Restricting caloric intake to 1200 calories per day can have significant psychological and biological effects. Research indicates that such a low-calorie diet increases cortisol production, a stress hormone, which can lead to weight gain rather than loss. Additionally, monitoring caloric intake can elevate perceived stress levels, suggesting that dieting might negatively impact psychological well-being and biological functioning1.
Weight Loss and Exercise: The Role of Caloric Restriction
Studies have shown that a 1200-calorie diet can be effective for weight loss, especially when combined with exercise. In a study involving moderately obese women, those who exercised while on a 1200-calorie diet experienced greater reductions in body weight and body fat percentage compared to those who did not exercise. However, the type of caloric restriction (constant vs. alternating) did not significantly affect weight or fat loss2. This highlights the importance of incorporating physical activity into weight loss programs.
Adherence to Low-Calorie Diets
Adherence to a 1200-calorie diet can be challenging. Research has shown that individuals who set specific calorie subgoals for meals and snacks reported greater feelings of deprivation and higher attrition rates, yet they achieved substantial weight loss. This suggests that while setting detailed goals can enhance weight loss, it may also increase the difficulty of maintaining the diet3.
Discrepancies in Self-Reported Caloric Intake
Some individuals report consuming less than 1200 calories per day but fail to lose weight. This discrepancy is often due to underreporting of actual food intake and overreporting of physical activity. Studies have found that these individuals do not have abnormal metabolic rates, indicating that the issue lies in inaccurate self-reporting rather than physiological resistance to weight loss4.
Comparison of Low-Calorie and Very-Low-Calorie Diets
When comparing low-calorie diets (800-1200 kcal/day) to very-low-calorie diets (300-600 kcal/day), the latter did not significantly increase the rate of weight loss. Patients on very-low-calorie diets often regained weight after refeeding, suggesting that extremely low-calorie diets may not be more effective than moderately low-calorie diets in the long term5.
Time-Restricted Eating vs. Daily Caloric Restriction
Time-restricted eating combined with a 1200-1500 calorie diet for women did not show significant benefits over daily caloric restriction alone. Both groups experienced similar weight loss and improvements in metabolic risk factors, indicating that the timing of calorie intake may not be as crucial as the overall caloric restriction6.
Long-Term Effectiveness of Caloric Restriction
Long-term studies on moderate caloric restriction (1200 kcal/day) have shown that while initial weight loss can be significant, maintaining this weight loss over time is challenging. Many individuals regain weight within a few years, underscoring the need for ongoing support and possibly more intensive interventions to sustain weight loss7.
Caloric Restriction vs. Fat Restriction
Caloric restriction (1000-1200 kcal/day) has been found to be more effective for weight loss than dietary fat restriction. Participants on a low-calorie diet lost more weight and maintained this loss better over 18 months compared to those on a low-fat diet. This supports the notion that overall calorie intake is a critical factor in weight management8.
Conclusion
A 1200-calorie diet can be effective for weight loss, particularly when combined with exercise. However, it can also increase stress levels and may be difficult to adhere to over the long term. Accurate self-reporting and ongoing support are crucial for sustained weight loss. While very-low-calorie diets and time-restricted eating do not offer significant advantages over moderate caloric restriction, focusing on overall calorie intake remains a key strategy for effective weight management.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
Low Calorie Dieting Increases Cortisol
Dieting may be detrimental to psychological well-being and biological functioning, with both calorie restriction and monitoring increasing cortisol production.
RCT
Highly CitedEvaluation of an alternating-calorie diet with and without exercise in the treatment of obesity.
Alternating-calorie diets were not beneficial or detrimental for weight loss, while exercise was clearly beneficial for weight loss therapy.
RCTHighly CitedThe influence of proximal vs. distal goals on adherence to prescribed calories.
Daily calorie goals result in greater deprivation and attrition, but substantial weight loss, compared to meal and snack subgoals in behavioral treatment for obesity.
Non-RCTDiscrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects.
Obese individuals who report low caloric intake often underestimate their actual intake and overestimate their physical activity, leading to self-reported diet resistance.
Observational StudyHighly CitedComparison of weight loss on low-calorie (800-1200) and very-low-calorie (300-600) diets.
Very-low-calorie diets (300-600 kcal) are not as efficient as expected in increasing weight loss in obese patients, with final weights being 0.5-2.0 kg higher than expected.
Non-RCTCalorie Restriction with or without Time-Restricted Eating in Weight Loss.
Time-restricted eating is not more beneficial for weight loss or reducing metabolic risk factors than daily calorie restriction in obese patients.
RCT
Rigorous JournalHighly CitedTreatment of Obesity by Moderate and Severe Caloric Restriction: Results of Clinical Research Trials
Moderate caloric restriction is effective for obese individuals, but long-term weight loss success depends on adherence and the intensity of supervision provided by weight loss programs.
Systematic ReviewHighly CitedCalorie restriction is more effective for obesity treatment than dietary fat restriction
Caloric restriction is more effective for obesity treatment than dietary fat restriction, supporting the public health message that calories count.
RCTSucrose polyester and covert caloric dilution.
Sucrose polyester (SPE) can help obese individuals lose weight by facilitating decreased caloric intake and improving their circulating lipoprotein profile without detecting or compensating for the dilution.
Non-RCTHighly CitedShort- and long-term changes in serum leptin dieting obese women: effects of caloric restriction and weight loss.
Caloric restriction significantly affects short-term serum leptin levels in obese women, while weight loss plays a more significant role in long-term changes.
Highly Cited