Marijuana tree
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers for "marijuana tree"
Understanding the Marijuana Tree: Spectral Properties, Genetic Structure, and Usage Patterns
Spectral Properties of Marijuana Leaves and Canopies
Remote Sensing and Spectral Discrimination
Remote sensing technology offers a promising method for monitoring marijuana (Cannabis sativa L.) growth on public lands. The spectral properties of marijuana leaves and canopies can be characterized to distinguish them from other vegetation. Research has shown that marijuana leaves exhibit specific reflectance values, particularly in the visible wavelength region at 550 nm, which are influenced by factors such as nitrogen fertilization rates1. As nitrogen fertilization decreases, marijuana leaves show lower chlorophyll concentrations and higher reflectance values.
Key Spectral Bands for Identification
The reflectance spectra of marijuana can be differentiated from other plants, especially monocots and trees, in the green and near-infrared wavelength regions. Significant differences in canopy reflectance were observed at 550 nm, 720 nm, and 800 nm, making these narrow spectral bands ideal for discriminating marijuana from other species1. Dense marijuana canopies are more easily distinguishable from other vegetation compared to sparse canopies.
Genetic Structure of Marijuana and Hemp
Differentiation Between Marijuana and Hemp
Marijuana and hemp, both derived from the Cannabis genus, have distinct genetic structures. Marijuana, known for its high tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content, is used for medicinal and recreational purposes, while hemp is cultivated for seed and fiber production and contains low THC levels4. Genetic analysis using single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) has shown significant differentiation between marijuana and hemp at a genome-wide level. Interestingly, hemp is genetically more similar to C. indica type marijuana than to C. sativa strains4.
Implications for Strain Identification
The genetic structure of marijuana strains often does not align with their reported ancestry of C. sativa and C. indica. This discrepancy suggests that strain names may not always reflect a meaningful genetic identity, highlighting the complexity and variability within Cannabis genetics4.
Predictors and Patterns of Marijuana Use
Risk Factors for Marijuana Use Initiation
Young adults are at an elevated risk for negative outcomes related to marijuana use. Studies have identified several predictors of marijuana use initiation, including increased alcohol consumption and engagement in sexual behavior2. These findings suggest that prevention efforts should target broader health-risk behaviors to mitigate the initiation of marijuana use.
Machine Learning in Predicting Daily Use
Machine learning techniques have proven effective in predicting daily marijuana use among adults. Factors such as e-cigarette and combustible cigarette use, male gender, unmarried status, poor mental health, depression, cognitive decline, abnormal sleep patterns, and high-risk behaviors are significant predictors of daily marijuana use6. Random Forest models, in particular, have shown high accuracy in predicting user status, demonstrating the utility of data mining methods in understanding behavioral health risks6.
Conclusion
The study of marijuana encompasses various aspects, from its spectral properties and genetic structure to the predictors of its use. Remote sensing can effectively identify marijuana canopies, while genetic analysis reveals the complexity of Cannabis strains. Understanding the predictors of marijuana use can inform targeted prevention strategies. Together, these insights contribute to a comprehensive understanding of marijuana and its implications for public health and environmental monitoring.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
Spectral Discrimination of Cannabis sativa L. Leaves and Canopies
Marijuana leaves and canopies can be effectively discriminated from other plants using narrow spectral bands in the green (550 nm), red (670 nm), red edge (720 nm), and near-infrared (800 nm) regions.
Highly CitedUsing Classification Trees to Examine Predictors of Marijuana Use Among a Wide Range of Variables
Increased alcohol use and sexual behavior are key predictors of marijuana use initiation in young adults, suggesting prevention efforts should target health-risk behaviors in general.
Observational StudyImmunoactive cannabinoids: therapeutic prospects for marijuana constituents.
Marijuana, the common name for Cannabis sativa, is a widely distributed hemp plant whose dried flowering tops and leaves have been used for medicinal purposes for 12,000 years by some estimates (1). The article by Malfait et al. (2) in this issue of PNAS is relevant to the question of whether such traditional uses of marijuana could be clinically justifiable today.
The Genetic Structure of Marijuana and Hemp
Marijuana and hemp are significantly differentiated at a genome-wide level, with hemp being genetically more similar to C. indica type marijuana than C. sativa strains.
Rigorous JournalHighly CitedChemical constituents of marijuana: the complex mixture of natural cannabinoids.
Cannabis contains a complex mixture of natural cannabinoids, which are responsible for its psychological properties and social aspects, making its approval as a medicine challenging.
Highly CitedBuilding risk prediction models for daily use of marijuana using machine learning techniques.
Machine learning models can effectively predict daily marijuana use and identify factors associated with it, with Random Forest being the best performing model.
Observational StudyMedical Marijuana: The Continuing Story
Marijuana has long been used as a medicinal herb, with modern scientific research revealing its potential therapeutic effects and establishing cannabinoid receptors in the human body.
Making Decisions With Trees: Examining Marijuana Outcomes Among College Students Using Recursive Partitioning
Norms and marijuana identity are key factors in identifying marijuana users and nonusers among college students, while use frequency, protective strategies, and urgency influence negative consequences.
Observational Study