Searched over 200M research papers for "metformin price"
6 papers analyzed
These studies suggest metformin is generally cost-effective and sometimes cost-saving for treating and preventing type 2 diabetes, though its cost-effectiveness may decrease with age.
20 papers analyzed
Metformin is a widely used first-line pharmacotherapy for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Its cost-effectiveness has been a subject of extensive research, particularly in comparison to other diabetes management strategies and medications. This article synthesizes findings from multiple studies to provide a comprehensive overview of the cost-effectiveness of metformin.
The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) and its subsequent Outcomes Study (DPPOS) have provided significant insights into the cost-effectiveness of metformin. Over a 10-year period, the cumulative direct medical costs for metformin were found to be $2,281 per capita, which is lower than both lifestyle interventions and placebo . The study concluded that metformin is marginally cost-saving compared to placebo, making it a financially viable option for diabetes prevention in high-risk adults.
In the short term, over a 3-year period, the cost of metformin interventions was approximately $34,500 per case of diabetes delayed or prevented, and $99,200 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. When considering long-term projections, the cost per QALY for metformin was about $29,900, which is within the range of what is typically considered cost-effective in the United States.
A study evaluating the cost-utility of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) such as semaglutide, dulaglutide, and exenatide in patients on metformin-based therapy found that these alternatives are significantly more expensive. For instance, the total costs for semaglutide were $42,012.47, compared to $24,931.27 for dulaglutide, and $40,264.80 for exenatide over a 40-year simulation. This indicates that while GLP-1 RAs may offer clinical benefits, their high costs make metformin a more cost-effective option.
In Ethiopia, the cost-effectiveness of adding saxagliptin or glibenclamide to metformin therapy was analyzed. The annual cost per patient for metformin alone was $70, compared to $75 for metformin plus glibenclamide, and $309 for metformin plus saxagliptin. The study concluded that saxagliptin is not cost-effective due to its high cost, whereas glibenclamide offers a more affordable second-line therapy option.
The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) highlighted the economic efficiency of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin in overweight patients. The study found that metformin not only increased life expectancy by 0.4 years but also resulted in a net saving of £258 per patient over a median duration of 10.7 years due to lower complication costs. This reinforces the cost-saving potential of metformin in specific patient populations.
Metformin remains a cost-effective and economically efficient option for the management and prevention of type 2 diabetes. Its affordability, especially when compared to other pharmacological interventions, makes it an attractive choice for both healthcare providers and patients. The consistent findings across various studies underscore the value of metformin in both short-term and long-term diabetes management strategies.
Most relevant research papers on this topic