Metop tartrate to succinate
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Comparison of Metoprolol Tartrate and Metoprolol Succinate
Introduction to Metoprolol Forms
Metoprolol is a beta-blocker commonly used to treat various cardiovascular conditions, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, and angina. It is available in two primary forms: metoprolol tartrate (MT) and metoprolol succinate (MS). While both forms are effective, they have different pharmacokinetic properties and clinical applications.
Hemodynamic Effects in Heart Failure
Studies have shown that both metoprolol tartrate and metoprolol succinate produce similar hemodynamic and clinical effects in patients with congestive heart failure. In a comparative study, patients treated with either form experienced significant improvements in functional, exercise, and hemodynamic parameters over three months1. However, both forms also exhibited parallel adverse hemodynamic effects when the full dose was readministered during chronic therapy, indicating no significant difference in their long-term hemodynamic impact1.
Structural and Behavioral Differences
At the molecular level, metoprolol tartrate and metoprolol succinate exhibit close similarities in their crystal lattices. However, they behave differently under temperature variations. Metoprolol succinate shows a reversible anisotropic lattice expansion/contraction and quickly recrystallizes after melting, whereas metoprolol tartrate expands/contracts isotropically and forms an amorphous solid upon cooling, taking several days to revert to its original crystalline form2. These differences are crucial for pharmaceutical applications, particularly in drug formulation and stability.
Heart Rate Management in Acute Myocardial Infarction
In patients with acute myocardial infarction, both metoprolol tartrate and metoprolol succinate effectively reduce heart rates. However, the degree and trend of heart rate reduction over the first 72 hours post-medication show no significant difference between the two forms4. This suggests that either form can be used effectively for heart rate management in acute settings.
Efficacy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Heart Failure
For patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) complicated by chronic heart failure, metoprolol succinate has shown superior efficacy in improving cardiac function compared to metoprolol tartrate. However, both forms have similar safety profiles and do not significantly differ in their impact on lung function or quality of life5.
Clinical and Economic Considerations in Ischemic Heart Disease
In patients with ischemic heart disease, both metoprolol tartrate and metoprolol succinate are effective in preventing cardiac events such as myocardial infarction and angina attacks. Metoprolol succinate has been noted for its direct anti-sclerosis effect, which is not observed with metoprolol tartrate8. Despite this, metoprolol tartrate offers significant pharmacoeconomic advantages due to its lower cost7 8.
Conclusion
Both metoprolol tartrate and metoprolol succinate are effective beta-blockers for managing various cardiovascular conditions. While they exhibit similar clinical efficacy and safety profiles, their structural differences and pharmacoeconomic considerations may influence the choice of treatment. Metoprolol succinate may offer advantages in specific clinical scenarios, such as chronic heart failure and COPD, but metoprolol tartrate remains a cost-effective option for many patients.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic