Order of the planets by size
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Order of the Planets by Size
Understanding the order of planets by size is crucial for both planetary science and astronomy. This article synthesizes recent research findings to provide a clear picture of how planets are ordered by size, particularly focusing on exoplanetary systems discovered by the Kepler mission.
Planet Size Distribution and Detection Biases
Detection Biases in Kepler Systems
The apparent size ordering of planets in Kepler systems can be significantly influenced by detection biases. The transit signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) used in Kepler detections varies with stellar properties and orbital periods, leading to different detection thresholds for planetary sizes. This variation can create the illusion of correlated sizes and ordered spacings among planets in the same system. When these biases are accounted for, the physical properties of Kepler planets appear largely independent of their siblings and parent star, suggesting that dynamical evolution has erased initial formation conditions1.
Relative Sizes of Planets in Multi-Planet Systems
In systems where at least one planet is Neptune-sized or larger, the larger planet is typically the one with the longer orbital period. This size-location correlation is not observed in pairs of planets where both are smaller than Neptune. Specifically, if at least one planet in a pair has a radius of approximately 3 Earth radii (R⊕) or larger, 68% of the pairs have the inner planet smaller than the outer planet. However, no preferred sequential ordering is seen if both planets are smaller than 3 R⊕2.
Size-Ordering and Formation Pathways
Entropy and Size-Ordering
The size-ordering of planets in a system can provide insights into their formation and evolutionary history. Systems with low entropy in their size-ordering suggest a non-random formation process. Kepler systems show a significant deficit in entropy compared to randomly generated populations, indicating that these systems retain some memory of their initial formation conditions. This finding supports the hypothesis that dynamical evolution, while chaotic, does not completely erase the initial size-ordering of planets3.
Planet Radius Gap
The distribution of planet sizes reveals a notable gap between rocky super-Earths and gas-dominated sub-Neptunes. This gap, observed in the radius distribution of Kepler planets, is influenced by factors such as a planet's orbital distance and the mass of its host star. The gap is partially filled, suggesting that photoevaporation of low-density atmospheres plays a significant role in shaping the size distribution of planets4 7.
Composition and Internal Structure
Bimodal Distribution of Planet Sizes
The radii of exoplanets show a bimodal distribution, with peaks corresponding to smaller rocky planets and larger intermediate-size planets. Planets with radii between 2 and 4 R⊕ are thought to be either gas dwarfs with rocky cores and H2-rich envelopes or water worlds with significant amounts of H2O. The precise measurements of planet radii and densities help constrain their bulk compositions and internal structures, indicating that many intermediate-size planets are likely water worlds6.
Conclusion
The order of planets by size in exoplanetary systems is influenced by detection biases, formation pathways, and evolutionary processes. While detection biases can create apparent correlations in planet sizes, the intrinsic properties of planets reveal a more complex picture. The size-ordering of planets provides valuable insights into their formation and evolution, with factors such as photoevaporation and host star mass playing crucial roles in shaping the observed size distribution. Understanding these factors helps us better comprehend the diversity and complexity of planetary systems.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic