Pravastatin versus crestor
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Consensus Meter
Comparative Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Pravastatin vs. Crestor (Rosuvastatin)
LDL Cholesterol Reduction: Crestor vs. Pravastatin
When comparing the efficacy of Crestor (rosuvastatin) and pravastatin in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), multiple studies have demonstrated that Crestor is significantly more effective. In a randomized, double-blind study involving 502 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, rosuvastatin at doses of 5 mg and 10 mg reduced LDL-C by 42% and 49%, respectively. In contrast, pravastatin at a 20 mg dose only achieved a 28% reduction in LDL-C levels. This substantial difference underscores the superior efficacy of rosuvastatin in lowering LDL-C compared to pravastatin.
Achievement of Cholesterol Goals
The same study also evaluated the success rates of patients in achieving cholesterol goals set by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II (NCEP ATP II) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Results showed that 87% of patients on rosuvastatin 10 mg and 71% on rosuvastatin 5 mg met the NCEP ATP II goals, compared to only 53% of those on pravastatin. Similarly, EAS goals were achieved by 83% and 63% of patients on rosuvastatin 10 mg and 5 mg, respectively, while only 20% of pravastatin patients met these targets. These findings highlight rosuvastatin's superior performance in helping patients reach their cholesterol management goals.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
In terms of cost-effectiveness, rosuvastatin also appears to have an edge over pravastatin. An analysis from the Statin Therapies for Elevated Lipid Levels Compared Across Doses to Rosuvastatin (STELLAR) trial assessed the cost-effectiveness of various statins, including rosuvastatin and pravastatin, from the perspective of U.S. healthcare payers. The study concluded that rosuvastatin at the recommended starting dose of 10 mg was the most cost-effective statin for achieving LDL-C reduction and meeting cholesterol goals over a 1-year period. This analysis considered both the clinical efficacy and the drug costs, reinforcing rosuvastatin's value in clinical practice.
Legal and Market Considerations
Despite its clinical advantages, Crestor has faced legal challenges related to its patent. AstraZeneca, the manufacturer of Crestor, has taken legal action against several generic drug manufacturers attempting to market generic versions of rosuvastatin. These legal battles are centered around the validity and enforceability of Crestor's patent, which is set to expire in 2016. The outcome of these legal disputes could impact the availability and cost of rosuvastatin in the market.
Conclusion
In summary, rosuvastatin (Crestor) demonstrates superior efficacy in reducing LDL-C levels and achieving cholesterol management goals compared to pravastatin. Additionally, it is more cost-effective from a healthcare payer's perspective. However, ongoing legal challenges regarding its patent may influence its market dynamics. For patients and healthcare providers, these findings suggest that rosuvastatin is a more effective and economically viable option for managing hypercholesterolemia.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic