Protein grams calories
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Protein Intake and Caloric Considerations: A Comprehensive Overview
Current Protein Intake in America
Protein Consumption Patterns
Recent data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2004 provides insights into the protein consumption patterns of Americans. The study found that protein intake varies significantly across different age groups. Young children consume an average of 56 grams per day, while adults aged 19-30 years consume about 91 grams per day. In the elderly, the intake drops to approximately 66 grams per day1.
Protein as a Percentage of Caloric Intake
When examining protein intake as a percentage of total caloric intake, the median intake ranges from 13.4% in children aged 4-8 years to 16.0% in men aged 51-70 years. Even at the 95th percentile, protein intake does not exceed 20.8% of total calories, which is well below the upper acceptable limit of 35%1. This suggests that while protein intake is generally adequate, there is room for increased consumption, especially given the benefits of higher protein intake on weight management and other physiological functions.
High Protein Diets in Resistance-Trained Individuals
Effects on Body Composition
A study investigating the effects of a very high protein diet (4.4 grams per kilogram of body weight per day) on resistance-trained individuals found that such high protein consumption did not significantly alter body composition. Participants in the high protein group consumed an average of 307 grams of protein per day, compared to 138 grams in the control group. Despite the substantial increase in protein and caloric intake, there were no significant changes in body weight, fat mass, fat-free mass, or percent body fat2. This indicates that extremely high protein intake does not necessarily lead to changes in body composition in resistance-trained individuals.
Protein Needs During Caloric Restriction
For resistance-trained athletes undergoing caloric restriction, protein needs are higher. A systematic review suggests that protein intake should be between 2.3 to 3.1 grams per kilogram of fat-free mass, especially when athletes are lean and undergoing significant caloric restriction. This higher intake helps mitigate the loss of fat-free mass during periods of reduced caloric intake3.
Protein and Caloric Intake in Critical Illness
Early Nutritional Support
In critically ill patients, the balance between calorie and protein intake is crucial. The NUTRIREA-3 trial is designed to compare the effects of early calorie-protein restriction versus standard calorie-protein targets in mechanically ventilated patients. The trial aims to determine if restricting calories and protein during the acute phase of critical illness can reduce mortality and dependency on intensive care4.
Optimized Nutrition Therapy
Another study compared optimized calorie and high protein nutrition therapy to standard nutrition care in critically ill patients. The optimized group received protein at 2.0 to 2.2 grams per kilogram per day, while the control group received 1.4 to 1.5 grams per kilogram per day. Although there was no significant difference in physical quality of life outcomes between the two groups, a negative delta protein (protein received minus predetermined protein requirement) was associated with lower physical quality of life scores at 3 and 6 months post-randomization5. This suggests that meeting or exceeding protein requirements is important for long-term recovery in critically ill patients.
Balancing Protein and Caloric Intake
Energy and Nitrogen Metabolism
The relationship between caloric intake and protein metabolism is complex. Adequate caloric intake is essential to conserve body nitrogen and maintain a balance between fat stores and lean body mass. For example, a weanling puppy requires approximately 200 calories and 1 gram of nitrogen per day per kilogram of body weight for growth, which decreases as the animal matures6. This balance is crucial for overall health and effective nutrient utilization.
Misleading Caloric Values of Protein
It is important to note that the caloric value of protein can be misleading. While protein can provide 4 calories per gram, this only occurs if the protein is completely burned for energy. If the protein is used for tissue building, it does not contribute to caloric intake. Therefore, the actual caloric contribution of protein can range from 0 to 4 calories per gram, depending on its utilization in the body7.
Conclusion
Understanding the interplay between protein intake and caloric consumption is essential for optimizing health and performance. While current protein intake in America is generally adequate, there is potential for increased consumption to support various physiological functions. For resistance-trained individuals and critically ill patients, higher protein intake is particularly beneficial. Balancing protein and caloric intake is crucial for maintaining lean body mass and overall health.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
Current protein intake in America: analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2004.
Americans consume an average of 56-91 g/d of protein, with 7.7% of adolescent females and 7.2-8.6% of older adult women reporting below their estimated average requirement.
Observational Study
Very Rigorous Journal
Highly CitedThe effects of consuming a high protein diet (4.4 g/kg/d) on body composition in resistance-trained individuals
A very high protein diet (4.4 g/kg/d) does not increase body fat in resistance-trained individuals when maintaining the same training regimen.
RCTVery Rigorous JournalHighly CitedA systematic review of dietary protein during caloric restriction in resistance trained lean athletes: a case for higher intakes.
Energy-restricted resistance-trained athletes need 2.3-3.1g/kg of protein to maintain leanness and maintain muscle mass during caloric restriction.
Systematic ReviewHighly CitedImpact of early low-calorie low-protein versus standard-calorie standard-protein feeding on outcomes of ventilated adults with shock: design and conduct of a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group trial (NUTRIREA-3)
Early low-calorie low-protein feeding may decrease day 90 mortality and ICU dependency in mechanically ventilated patients receiving vasoactive amine therapy for shock compared to standard calorie and protein targets.
RCT
Large Human Trial
Rigorous JournalOptimized calorie and high protein intake versus recommended caloric-protein intake in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled phase II clinical trial
Optimized calorie and high protein strategies did not improve physical quality of life in critically ill patients, but a negative delta protein was associated with a lower physical component summary score at 3 and 6 months postrandomization.
RCTRigorous JournalCALORIES AND PROTEIN NUTRITION
A proper balance between energy and nitrogen metabolism is crucial for maintaining optimal health and welfare in animals.
Labeling protein preparations.
The number of calories furnished by 1 Gm. of protein in a nutritional preparation varies depending on the efficiency with which it is used for tissue protein formation and energy production.
Classification and definition of protein-calorie malnutrition.
An agreed classification and definition of protein-calorie malnutrition are crucial for addressing variations in prevalence and guiding preventive policies.
Highly Cited