Are there racial disparities in charging decisions by prosecutors
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Consensus Meter
Racial Disparities in Prosecutorial Charging Decisions
Introduction to Racial Disparities in Prosecution
Racial disparities in the criminal justice system, particularly in prosecutorial charging decisions, have been a subject of extensive research. The question of whether prosecutors exhibit racial bias when deciding to charge individuals has yielded mixed results, with some studies indicating significant disparities while others find minimal or no differences.
Evidence of Racial Disparities in Charging Decisions
Minority Disadvantage in Prosecutorial Outcomes
Several studies have found that minority offenders, particularly Black and Latino individuals, face more unfavorable prosecutorial outcomes compared to their White counterparts. A meta-analysis of various studies concluded that minority offenders are more likely to be charged or fully prosecuted than White offenders, with methodological factors accounting for some variability in these findings. Additionally, research using data from federal cases revealed that Black arrestees are 1.75 times more likely to face charges carrying mandatory minimum sentences compared to White arrestees, contributing to longer sentences for Black individuals.
Internalized Racism and Prosecutorial Decisions
The role of prosecutors' race in charging decisions has also been examined. One study hypothesized that Black prosecutors might be more punitive towards Black defendants due to internalized racism. The findings supported this hypothesis, showing that Black and Latino defendants were more likely to receive custodial plea offers from Black prosecutors compared to White and Asian defendants.
Cumulative Disadvantage Across Decision Points
Research tracking multiple discretionary points in the prosecution process found that Black and Latino defendants were more likely to be detained, receive custodial plea offers, and be incarcerated compared to White defendants. However, they were also more likely to benefit from case dismissals. These disparities were particularly pronounced for person offenses.
Disparities in Drug Charging Trajectories
An analysis of drug charging trajectories in Miami-Dade County highlighted that Black Latinx and Black non-Latinx individuals faced more severe charges at arrest compared to White non-Latinx individuals. These disparities persisted throughout the charging process, indicating that initial police charges significantly influence prosecutorial decisions.
Mixed Findings and Methodological Considerations
Inconclusive Results from Randomized Experiments
Contrary to observational studies, a randomized controlled experiment found no detectable prejudicial effects of race and class on prosecutorial decisions. This suggests that other factors, possibly unobserved case details or socio-economic status, might drive the observed disparities in criminal justice outcomes.
Algorithmic Interventions to Reduce Bias
Efforts to reduce racial bias in charging decisions through algorithmic redaction of race-related information have shown promise. A study deploying such a system found that it effectively obscured race-related information, although it did not significantly alter charging rates, indicating minimal pre-existing bias in the studied jurisdiction.
Conclusion
The body of research on racial disparities in prosecutorial charging decisions presents a complex picture. While many studies indicate significant disparities disadvantaging minority defendants, others suggest that these disparities may be influenced by various factors, including methodological differences and socio-economic status. Efforts to mitigate bias through algorithmic interventions show potential, but further research is needed to fully understand and address the root causes of these disparities.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic