Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that racial disparities exist in prosecutorial charging decisions, with minority offenders, particularly African-Americans, facing greater odds of being charged or fully prosecuted compared to White offenders, influenced by factors such as implicit bias, pretrial decisions, and plea-bargaining processes.
6 papers analyzed
20 papers analyzed
Racial disparities in prosecutorial decisions have been a significant concern in the criminal justice system. Researchers have explored whether race influences the likelihood of being charged, the severity of charges, and the outcomes of plea bargains. The findings, however, have been mixed, with some studies indicating significant racial biases while others find no substantial differences.
Minority Disadvantage in Charging Decisions:
Plea Bargaining Disparities:
Impact of Implicit Bias:
Mixed Findings on Prosecutorial Discretion:
Role of Socioeconomic Status:
The research indicates that racial disparities do exist in prosecutorial decisions, with minority defendants often facing harsher outcomes than their White counterparts. These disparities are evident in charging decisions, plea bargaining, and pretrial processing. Implicit biases and socioeconomic factors further complicate the issue, suggesting a multifaceted problem that requires comprehensive reforms to ensure fairness and equity in the criminal justice system.
Most relevant research papers on this topic