Searched over 200M research papers
2 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that an evidence-based approach and shared decision-making are recommended for evaluating chest pain, while cultural differences can affect the description and diagnosis of chest pain.
20 papers analyzed
Chest pain is a common reason for emergency department visits and can be a symptom of various underlying conditions, ranging from benign to life-threatening. The "2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain" provides a comprehensive framework for clinicians to assess and diagnose chest pain in adults. This guideline emphasizes an evidence-based approach to risk stratification and diagnostic workup, incorporating cost-value considerations and advocating for shared decision-making with patients.
Atypical chest pain descriptions can complicate the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. A study focusing on a population from the southern United States found that 43% of patients with enzyme-documented myocardial infarction presented with atypical chest pain descriptions. The term "sharp" was frequently used in these atypical presentations, highlighting regional and cultural differences in pain description. This suggests that the term "sharp" may not always indicate the severity or quality of the pain but rather its acuity, which can mislead clinicians during the diagnostic process.
When evaluating sharp chest pain near the heart, it is crucial to consider both typical and atypical presentations of myocardial ischemia. The guidelines recommend a structured approach to risk stratification, which includes assessing patient history, physical examination, and appropriate diagnostic testing such as electrocardiograms (ECGs) and cardiac biomarkers. Given the prevalence of atypical descriptions, especially in certain demographics, clinicians should be aware of these variations to avoid misdiagnosis.
Random sharp pain in the chest near the heart can be a challenging symptom to evaluate due to the potential for atypical presentations. The 2021 guidelines provide a robust framework for clinicians to systematically assess and diagnose chest pain, emphasizing the importance of considering cultural and regional differences in pain descriptions. By following these guidelines, healthcare providers can improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
Most relevant research papers on this topic