Searched over 200M research papers for "stroke assesment"
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that stroke assessment involves tools like the Stroke Knowledge Test, early neuroimaging, neurophysiological assessments, blood biomarkers, and predictive models like CNNdeep, while effective management and rehabilitation strategies include interventional therapies, neuromuscular electric stimulation, and error augmentation training.
20 papers analyzed
Understanding stroke is crucial for individuals to mitigate their risk of experiencing a stroke. Accurate and reliable tools are necessary to measure stroke knowledge effectively.
A systematic review identified 23 unique tools for assessing stroke knowledge. These tools were evaluated for content validity, feasibility, and measurement properties. The Stroke Knowledge Test emerged as the most comprehensive tool, meeting all content validity criteria and showing validation data for six measurement properties. However, it still requires updates and further validation to be considered a gold standard.
The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association has provided guidelines for the primary prevention of ischemic stroke. These guidelines classify risk factors into nonmodifiable (e.g., age, sex, race), modifiable (e.g., hypertension, smoking, diabetes), and potentially modifiable categories (e.g., metabolic syndrome, alcohol abuse).
The guidelines recommend various strategies to reduce stroke risk, including managing hypertension, avoiding smoking, controlling diabetes, and maintaining a healthy diet and physical activity level.
In-hospital strokes account for 6.5% to 15% of all strokes, often occurring in patients undergoing surgical procedures or with cardiac disorders. Rapid assessment is crucial, but delays are common due to comorbidities and hospital complexities.
Thrombolysis, particularly intra-arterial thrombolysis, is a feasible and reasonably safe option for selected patients. Increasing awareness among hospital physicians about these interventions can reduce assessment delays.
A study investigated the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on the erector spinae muscles in post-stroke patients. The results showed significant improvements in balance and motor function, suggesting that NMES combined with conventional therapy can enhance rehabilitation outcomes.
The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable recommends standardized protocols for measuring upper limb movement quality. These protocols include kinematic and kinetic assessments, which are essential for pooling data across studies and improving rehabilitation strategies.
Accurate prediction of motor recovery post-stroke is vital for rehabilitation planning. Recent studies have shown that early assessments using motor impairment scores and neuroimaging can predict recovery outcomes effectively. Techniques like functional MRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation have also shown promise in predicting motor recovery.
Blood biomarkers such as brain natriuretic peptide, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and D-dimer have shown potential in differentiating stroke subtypes within 24 hours of symptom onset. These biomarkers can aid in the early and accurate diagnosis of stroke, facilitating timely and appropriate treatment.
Effective stroke assessment encompasses a range of tools and strategies, from knowledge assessment and risk factor management to in-hospital stroke evaluation and rehabilitation. Advances in diagnostic biomarkers and predictive models further enhance the ability to provide personalized treatment plans, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Most relevant research papers on this topic