Surfaces of teeth chart

Searched over 200M research papers

Research Analysis by Consensus

Beta · 20 papers

Consensus Meter

Yes

Possibly

Understanding Tooth Surfaces: A Comprehensive Overview

Introduction to Tooth Surface Analysis

The study of tooth surfaces is crucial for various dental applications, including caries detection, orthodontic treatment, and restorative dentistry. Tooth surfaces can be analyzed using different methods, each providing unique insights into the structural and functional aspects of teeth.

Changes in Tooth Surfaces with Age

Tooth surfaces undergo significant changes as individuals age. Studies using optical microscopy of metal-shadowed collodion replicas have shown that the surfaces of unerupted and recently erupted teeth are quite similar but differ markedly from older teeth. These differences are attributed to attritional and environmental influences that alter the surface structure over time. The regularity of these changes allows for age-related comparisons, with unerupted or recently erupted teeth serving as a standard for evaluating surface details.

Carious Tooth Surfaces

The assessment of carious tooth surfaces is essential for understanding the extent and impact of dental caries. The DMFTS (decayed, missing, and filled tooth surfaces) index is commonly used to quantify caries involvement. Studies have shown that extracted teeth with carious lesions often have multiple surfaces affected, with some methodologies assigning up to five surfaces for completely destroyed crowns. This approach helps in providing a more accurate picture of caries prevalence and severity.

Automated Labeling of Dental Surfaces

Advancements in technology have led to the development of automated methods for labeling dental surfaces. MeshSegNet, a deep-learning method, has been proposed for automated tooth labeling on raw dental surfaces acquired by intraoral scanners (IOS). This method integrates multi-scale local contextual features and uses a dense fusion strategy for accurate mesh cell annotation. Experimental results have demonstrated that MeshSegNet significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art methods for 3D shape segmentation.

Radiographic vs. Clinical Assessment of Caries

Comparing radiographic and clinical assessments of caries on posterior approximal surfaces reveals differences in detection accuracy. For permanent teeth, radiolucencies extending to the inner half of the dentine were found to be cavitated in 100% of cases, while for primary teeth, the figure was 95.5%. These findings suggest that radiographic assessments can be highly indicative of cavitation, particularly in deeper layers of dentine.

Clustering Effects in Dental Caries Data

The clustering of carious surfaces within teeth and individuals has significant implications for dental surveys and epidemiological studies. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and design effects (DE) are used to estimate the variance attributable to different levels of clustering. Studies have shown that 10% of the variance in surface caries is due to individual differences, while 30% is due to variation between teeth within individuals. Multilevel models provide a better fit for analyzing such data compared to simple logistic models.

Accuracy of 3D Printed Dental Models

The accuracy of 3D printed dental models varies across different tooth surfaces. Studies have found that occlusal surfaces, especially pits and fissures of posterior teeth, exhibit greater distortions compared to other surfaces. This finding is crucial for orthodontic applications where precise modeling of tooth surfaces is required.

In-Vivo Accuracy of Tooth Surface Reconstruction

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and dental magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) are used for in-vivo tooth surface reconstruction. CBCT has been found to be more accurate than dMRI, with geometric deviations of 0.102 mm RMS compared to 0.261 mm RMS for dMRI. Both methods, however, provide reliable reconstructions, with CBCT being particularly effective even in the presence of metal artifacts.

Variations in Facial Surface Contours

Facial surface contours of teeth vary significantly among individuals and even among teeth of the same type. This variation affects orthodontic treatments, particularly the placement of brackets. Studies have shown that posterior teeth exhibit greater variation in facial surface contours compared to anterior teeth, suggesting the need for custom construction of orthodontic brackets to accommodate individual differences.

Conclusion

The study of tooth surfaces encompasses various aspects, from age-related changes and caries assessment to advanced imaging techniques and orthodontic applications. Understanding these surfaces is essential for accurate diagnosis, treatment planning, and the development of customized dental solutions. Advances in technology, such as deep learning and 3D printing, continue to enhance our ability to analyze and utilize tooth surface data effectively.