The final understanding theory
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
The Final Understanding Theory in Science
Theoretical Understanding in Science: Inferential Model
The concept of theoretical understanding in science is a complex philosophical construct that specifies the conditions necessary for a scientist to truly understand a theory. One model, developed through examples from elementary physics, emphasizes the importance of inferential cycles in achieving understanding. This model posits that for a scientist (S) to understand a theory (T), they must engage in a series of problem-solving cycles where each inference must be reliable and based on principles that are part of the theory1. This approach is philosophically robust and offers a more sophisticated account than those developed in the psychology of physics and artificial intelligence1.
Cognitive Background and Unification: A Theory of Scientific Understanding
Another significant theory of scientific understanding involves the integration of new phenomena into an existing cognitive background corpus (C). This theory suggests that understanding a phenomenon (P) requires fitting it into the cognitive background (C) through connections that increase the unification of C. This process involves cognitive changes that can be seen as sequences of shifts within the cognitive corpus. The theory also distinguishes between consonant and dissonant understanding, refining the concept of unification to handle puzzling phenomena effectively2. This refined theory has been applied to various examples, including the development of the atomic model, demonstrating its practical applicability2.
Student Learning and Understanding: Qualitative Insights
In the context of higher education, understanding is often contrasted with mere reproduction of information. A qualitative study analyzing undergraduate students' experiences during their final degree examinations revealed that understanding can vary significantly in terms of breadth and depth. The study identified different forms of understanding based on how students organized and structured their revision material. These findings have important implications for teaching and examining practices in higher education, suggesting that fostering deeper understanding requires more than just encouraging rote learning3.
Conclusion
The final understanding theory in science encompasses various models and approaches, each contributing unique insights into how understanding is achieved and measured. The inferential model emphasizes the importance of reliable problem-solving cycles, while the cognitive background theory focuses on the unification of new phenomena with existing knowledge. Additionally, qualitative research in education highlights the diverse nature of understanding among students, underscoring the need for teaching methods that promote deeper comprehension. Together, these perspectives provide a comprehensive view of what it means to truly understand a scientific theory.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
Theoretical Understanding in Science
This paper develops a model of theoretical understanding in science, focusing on the conditions necessary and sufficient for a scientist to satisfy the construction 'S understands theory T', providing a more sophisticated account than models developed in psychology and artificial intelligence.
Outline of a theory of scientific understanding
The theory of scientific understanding focuses on fitting phenomena into the cognitive background corpus and understanding cognitive changes as sequences of shifts of phenomena in the corpus.
Highly CitedExperiences of understanding in revising for degree examinations
Understanding in undergraduate students' revising for degree examinations varies in breadth and depth, and is influenced by the organization and structure of material for revision purposes.
Observational StudyHighly CitedScaling of theory-of-mind tasks.
Preschoolers' developing theory of mind shows a consistent developmental progression, with most passing later items when they successfully completed earlier ones.
Meta-AnalysisHighly CitedContrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: the student experience and its implications
Traditional degree examinations do not consistently test deep, conceptual understanding, and the type of questions set influences the forms of understanding students seek during studying and revision.
Observational StudyHighly CitedPersonal understanding and target understanding: mapping influences on the outcomes of learning.
The conceptual framework highlights the importance of teacher and student activities, individual and social context, and the distinction between 'target' and 'personal' understanding, which influences learning outcomes in education.
Literature ReviewHighly CitedTheory Building
This paper systematically reviews management theory building literature, focusing on conflict, character, setting, sequence, and plot and arc, to better understand how specific theorizing tools facilitate the theorizing process and promote pragmatic empirical theorizing.
Systematic ReviewHighly CitedWhat’s the Point of Understanding?
Understanding serves the practical function of identifying good explainers, while knowledge focuses on true beliefs, and understanding provides valuable insights into epistemic evaluation and epistemic luck.
Students' understanding of theory in undergraduate education
Students at Level 2 understanding of theory in undergraduate education achieve the highest learning outcomes, potentially due to differences in their pre-conceived understanding of events and relationships in authentic leadership cases.
Observational Study