Time is space
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
The Interplay Between Time and Space: A Comprehensive Overview
Mental Time Line: Spatial Representation of Time
Recent research has provided compelling evidence that humans often represent time spatially, a concept known as the "mental time line." This phenomenon is characterized by a strong tendency to associate the past with the left side of space and the future with the right side. This spatial representation of time is accessed through spatial attention mechanisms, suggesting that our cognitive processing of time is deeply intertwined with spatial cognition. This interaction is not unique to time; similar patterns are observed in numerical cognition, where numbers are spatially mapped.
Relational and Absolute Concepts of Space and Time
The debate between relational and absolute concepts of space and time has been a longstanding one. According to Leibniz, space and time are merely orders of coexisting and successive events, respectively, without any substantial existence. In contrast, Newton posited that space and time are absolute entities. This distinction becomes particularly meaningful in the context of dynamical theories of motion, where the ability to formulate relational theories has been a significant challenge.
Space-Time Interdependence: Flexible Interactions
The relationship between time and space is not strictly unidirectional. Research has shown that the interaction between time and space can be flexible, with the directionality of influence depending on the perceptual acuity of the modality used. For instance, when participants used haptic perception, the effect of time on space was stronger than vice versa. However, when visual perception was also involved, the effects converged, indicating a shared representational format for time and space.
Cultural Variability in Space-Time Mappings
Cultural factors significantly influence how time is spatially represented. In many cultures, time is mapped along different spatial axes. For example, English speakers typically represent time on a horizontal axis, while Mandarin speakers use a vertical axis. Additionally, the direction of writing in a culture can affect these spatial representations. For instance, Chinese speakers' spatialization of time varies according to their exposure to different writing systems. This variability highlights the flexibility and cultural dependency of space-time mappings.
Neuroscientific Perspectives: Separate Yet Interconnected
In neuroscience, space and time are often treated as separate coordinates. However, neuronal activity related to navigation and memory often correlates with measures of distance and duration, suggesting an underlying connection. Despite these correlations, it is argued that neither instruments nor brains directly sense space or time. Instead, neuronal activity is a succession of events that give rise to our inferential models of space and time.
Limits to the Spatialization of Time
While spatial metaphors for time are prevalent, there are inherent limits to this spatialization. Time possesses unique attributes such as transience, which cannot be fully captured by spatial metaphors. Unlike space, which can be linear and directional, the transient nature of time requires a notion of change, making it fundamentally different and resistant to complete spatial metaphorization.
Conclusion
The intricate relationship between time and space is evident across various domains, from cognitive psychology to cultural studies and neuroscience. While spatial representations of time are common and culturally influenced, the unique attributes of time, particularly its transience, pose challenges to fully capturing it through spatial metaphors. Understanding this interplay not only enriches our comprehension of cognitive processes but also underscores the complexity and variability of human perception and representation of time and space.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic