Searched over 200M research papers for "valsartan generic"
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that generic valsartan is generally bioequivalent to the reference formulations and effective in treating hypertension, but recalls due to contamination have led to increased hospitalizations and emergency visits.
20 papers analyzed
Valsartan is a selective angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker commonly prescribed for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. It is available in both branded and generic formulations, with the latter being more cost-effective for patients and healthcare systems.
Several studies have investigated the bioequivalence of generic valsartan formulations compared to the branded versions. A study conducted on healthy Indian male volunteers found that one of the two tested generic formulations was bioequivalent to the branded product, while the other was not. Another study in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions confirmed that a new generic formulation of valsartan 160 mg met the European regulatory definition of bioequivalence. Similarly, a study in healthy Chinese volunteers demonstrated that a generic formulation of valsartan 80 mg was bioequivalent to the reference product under both fasting and fed conditions.
The efficacy and safety of generic valsartan have been compared to the original branded version in various clinical settings. A study involving patients with arterial hypertension and metabolic syndrome showed that both generic and original valsartan were equally effective in achieving target blood pressure levels, with no significant differences in safety profiles. Another study comparing valsartan to enalapril found that valsartan was as effective as enalapril in reducing blood pressure and was well-tolerated, with fewer incidences of coughing.
In July 2018, a significant recall of generic valsartan products occurred due to contamination with the carcinogen nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA). This recall affected over 22 countries, including Canada and the United States . The recall had notable consequences on healthcare utilization. In Ontario, Canada, the recall led to an increase in emergency department visits due to hypertension and a trend towards increased hospitalizations for stroke and transient ischemic attacks. Similarly, in Alberta, the recall impacted health services, highlighting the broader implications of drug recalls on patient care and healthcare systems.
A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing valsartan to losartan, another angiotensin II receptor blocker, found that valsartan was more effective in lowering blood pressure and reducing cardiovascular events. The study suggested that switching from valsartan to generic losartan might not be cost-effective in the long term, emphasizing the importance of considering individual patient needs over cost offsets.
Generic valsartan formulations have been shown to be bioequivalent to their branded counterparts, ensuring similar efficacy and safety profiles. However, the recall of contaminated generic valsartan products underscores the importance of stringent quality control in generic drug manufacturing. Despite the recall, valsartan remains a cost-effective and reliable option for managing hypertension and heart failure, provided that quality standards are maintained.
Most relevant research papers on this topic