Ventolin inhaler vs proair
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Comparison of Ventolin Inhaler vs ProAir Inhaler
Introduction to Ventolin and ProAir Inhalers
Ventolin and ProAir are two commonly used albuterol sulfate metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) for the management of asthma and other respiratory conditions. Both inhalers deliver the same total dose of albuterol sulfate, but they differ significantly in their spray characteristics, particle size distribution, and overall user experience.
Spray Characteristics and User Experience
Temperature and Spray Force
ProAir HFA delivers a warmer plume compared to Ventolin HFA, with minimum plume temperatures recorded at 7.2°C for ProAir and -35.9°C for Ventolin1. This warmer temperature can alleviate the "cold Freon effect" often associated with inhaler use, making ProAir more comfortable for patients. Additionally, ProAir has a significantly lower mean maximum spray force (33.6 mN) compared to Ventolin (75.9 mN), which can reduce throat deposition and improve the overall inhalation experience1.
Plume Duration
ProAir HFA also produces a longer-lasting plume, with a duration of 385 ms compared to 156 ms for Ventolin HFA1. This extended duration can help ensure a more consistent delivery of medication to the lungs.
Fine Particle Dose and Lung Deposition
Fine Particle Dose
The fine particle dose, which is the portion of the particle distribution that actually reaches the lungs, is significantly higher in ProAir compared to Ventolin. ProAir delivers 64 µg of albuterol sulfate as fine particles, whereas Ventolin delivers only 21 µg2. This means that ProAir is more efficient in delivering the therapeutic dose to the lungs, potentially leading to better clinical outcomes.
Impact of Valved Holding Chambers
Using a valved holding chamber (VHC) can mitigate some of the differences between these inhalers. The VHC successfully removes larger particles without reducing the fine particle dose, enhancing the delivery of medication to the lungs for both inhalers2 4. However, even with a VHC, ProAir still outperforms Ventolin in terms of fine particle dose.
Practical Implications for Patients
Dosage and Duration
Due to the higher fine particle dose delivered by ProAir, patients may require fewer puffs to achieve the same clinical benefit compared to Ventolin. This efficiency means that a single ProAir inhaler may last longer than a Ventolin inhaler, providing more doses per unit2.
Interval Between Actuations
The interval between actuations can also affect the performance of these inhalers. Studies suggest that decreasing the interval from 60 seconds to 30 or 15 seconds does not significantly impact the aerosol characteristics of ProAir and Ventolin5. However, Proventil, another albuterol MDI, showed some changes in fine-particle mass with shorter intervals5.
Conclusion
In summary, ProAir HFA offers several advantages over Ventolin HFA, including a warmer, lower-impact, and longer-lasting plume, as well as a higher fine particle dose. These characteristics can lead to a more comfortable and effective inhalation experience for patients. While both inhalers are effective in managing asthma symptoms, ProAir may provide a more efficient and user-friendly option for many patients.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
ProAir(®) HFA delivers warmer, lower-impact, longer-duration plumes containing higher fine particle dose than Ventolin(®) HFA.
ProAir(®) HFA delivers a warmer, lower-impact, and longer-lasting plume compared to Ventolin(®) HFA, providing a more consistent and comfortable experience for patients using pressurized metered-dose inhalers.
The effect of a holding chamber on albuterol metered-dose inhaler product differences.
Ventolin, Proventil, and ProAir are not interchangeable products, with Proventil or ProAir providing 2 to 3 times the dose of albuterol sulfate likely to reach the lungs compared to Ventolin, requiring 3 additional puffs for similar clinical benefit.
The Effect of a Holding Chamber on Albuterol Metered-Dose Inhaler Product Differences
A valved holding chamber may impact drug delivery and reduce systemic adverse effects in albuterol metered-dose inhaler products.
Non-RCTA novel approach to study the pMDI plume using an infrared camera and to evaluate the aerodynamic properties after varying the time between actuations.
Infrared camera analysis of pMDI plume characteristics reveals that time between actuations affects fine particle fraction, suggesting a need to reconsider one-minute interval guidelines for albuterol inhalers.
Effect of Interval Between Actuations of Albuterol Hydrofluoroalkane Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhalers on Their Aerosol Characteristics
Decreasing the interval between actuations of albuterol HFA from 60 to 30 and 15 seconds does not affect ProAir and Ventolin aerosol characteristics, but a 10-s delay significantly reduces fine-particle mass.
Two-way coupling and Kolmogorov scales on inhaler spray plume evolutions from Ventolin, ProAir, and Qvar.
Two-way coupling significantly improves predictions of aerosol behaviors in metered-dose inhalers, with droplet size and mass loading influencing spray dynamics.
Overcoming dose-counting mechanisms on metered-dose inhalers for urgent treatment in the operating room.
The new Ventolin HFA MDI with dose-counting mechanism delayed intraoperative bronchospasm treatment, but an old Proair HFA was found and used to effectively deliver albuterol to a pediatric patient.
Case ReportTherapeutic equivalence of Spiros dry powder inhaler and Ventolin metered dose inhaler. A bioassay using methacholine.
Spiros and Ventolin inhalers deliver comparable quantities of albuterol to the airways without significant differences in systemic effects.
Dose-response to salbutamol via a novel palm sized nebuliser (Aerodose Inhaler), conventional nebuliser (Pari LC Plus) and metered dose inhaler (Ventolin Evohaler) in moderate to severe asthmatics.
The Aerodose Inhaler is approximately five times as efficient as the Pari LC Plus and Evohaler in lung delivery of salbutamol for moderate to severe asthmatics.
RCTSwitching from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA is well tolerated and effective in patients with asthma.
Switching from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA maintains comparable asthma control with a similar safety profile in patients.
RCT
Large Human Trial