Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
Some studies suggest that genetic editing in humans is ethically acceptable under stringent regulations and for treating serious diseases, while other studies highlight significant ethical concerns, including potential harm to future generations, genetic discrimination, and the value of human life.
19 papers analyzed
The ethics of genetic editing in humans is a complex and multifaceted issue that has garnered significant attention with the advent of advanced technologies like CRISPR-Cas9. This topic involves a range of ethical considerations, from the potential benefits of treating genetic diseases to the moral implications of altering human embryos and the broader societal impacts.
Somatic vs. Germline Editing:
Ethical and Regulatory Standards:
Potential for Human Enhancement:
Public and Political Debate:
Impact on Individuals with Disabilities:
International Perspectives:
The ethics of genetic editing in humans encompass a range of issues, from the acceptability of somatic cell editing for therapeutic purposes to the contentious nature of germline editing and human enhancement. While there is broad support for using gene-editing technologies to treat serious diseases, the potential for heritable changes and non-therapeutic modifications raises significant ethical concerns. Ongoing public debate and stringent regulatory oversight are essential to navigate these complex ethical landscapes.
Most relevant research papers on this topic
What is the impact of video games on behavior?
How can the principles of environmental physiology (e.g., heat, cold, altitude) be applied to training and health?
supply chain management
Is Uncertainess and surprise the same?
Does physical exercise improve cognition?
Nucleate pool boiling