What happened to moon
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
The Formation and Evolution of the Moon
Theories on the Moon's Origin
Giant Impact Hypothesis
The most widely accepted theory for the Moon's origin is the Giant Impact Hypothesis. This theory suggests that the Moon formed from debris ejected after a Mars-sized body collided with the early Earth around 4.5 billion years ago . This collision produced a disk of debris that eventually coalesced to form the Moon. Simulations indicate that this impact could have resulted in a Moon with a composition similar to Earth's mantle, addressing the compositional similarities between the two bodies.
Multiple-Impact Hypothesis
An alternative to the single giant impact theory is the Multiple-Impact Hypothesis. This model proposes that the Moon formed from a series of smaller collisions rather than one large impact. Each collision created a debris disk around the proto-Earth, which then accreted to form moonlets. These moonlets eventually merged to form the Moon. This scenario can account for the Earth-Moon system's current properties and compositional similarities without requiring the specific conditions needed for a single giant impact.
Fission Theory
Before the Apollo missions, another theory suggested that the Moon formed from the Earth itself. According to this theory, the Earth initially rotated very rapidly, causing it to become unstable and split into two bodies: the Earth and a proto-Moon. The proto-Moon lost most of its mass and became the Moon we know today. This theory is supported by the depletion of certain elements in the Moon that are abundant in Earth's core, indicating that the Moon separated from Earth after the core had formed.
Capture Theory
Another hypothesis is that the Moon was originally a separate planet that was captured by Earth's gravity. This theory suggests that the Moon was captured in a retrograde orbit, which was later altered to its current orbit by tidal forces. This capture could explain some of the unique features of the Moon's orbit and its geological history.
Geological and Chemical Evidence
High-Temperature Formation
The composition of the Moon suggests it accreted at higher temperatures and lower pressures compared to terrestrial planets. This could be explained if the Moon's initial orbit had a high inclination. The Moon's surface shows evidence of severe heating, which led to the loss of water and other volatile elements.
Age of the Moon
The age of the Moon has been a subject of extensive study. Uranium-lead dating of lunar zircons indicates that the Moon formed around 4.51 billion years ago, within the first 60 million years of the solar system's existence. This early formation is crucial for understanding the evolution of the solar system and the formation of rocky planets, including Earth.
Volatile Elements and Water
Contrary to earlier beliefs, recent studies suggest that the Moon might not be entirely depleted of volatile elements, including water. Improved secondary ion mass spectrometry has revealed the presence of water in lunar volcanic glasses, indicating that the Moon's interior might contain more volatiles than previously thought. This finding necessitates a reevaluation of models concerning the Moon's formation and its thermal and chemical evolution.
Conclusion
The Moon's origin and evolution are complex and multifaceted, involving high-energy impacts, severe heating, and intricate orbital dynamics. While the Giant Impact Hypothesis remains the most widely accepted theory, alternative models like the Multiple-Impact Hypothesis and the Capture Theory also provide valuable insights. Geological and chemical evidence continues to refine our understanding, revealing a Moon that formed early in the solar system's history and retains traces of volatile elements, including water. These findings not only illuminate the Moon's past but also enhance our broader understanding of planetary formation and evolution.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic