What is the relation between European sovereignty and security
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
The Relationship Between European Sovereignty and Security
Digital Sovereignty and European Security Integration
Digital Sovereignty: The concept of digital sovereignty has become increasingly significant in the European Union's (EU) political and policy discussions. Digital sovereignty refers to the EU's efforts to control and develop its digital infrastructures and use digital tools for security governance. This notion has direct and indirect implications for European security, as it redefines how the EU integrates security policies across various domains1. The EU's focus on digital sovereignty aims to enhance its strategic autonomy and technological independence, which are crucial for maintaining security in the digital age8.
The Sharing of Sovereignty in European Security
Mutual Interference and Integration: Traditional notions of sovereignty have evolved within the EU, where mutual interference in domestic affairs has become a norm. This shared sovereignty extends beyond the EU to countries like Norway, Switzerland, and Iceland, which adhere to EU rules due to their economic and social ties. European security is managed through institutions like NATO and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), which promote transparency and cooperation among member states2. This interconnected governance structure highlights the complex relationship between sovereignty and security in Europe.
EU Homeland Security and Supranational Order
Security Policies and Sovereignty: Since the Maastricht Treaty of 1992 and especially after 9/11, the EU has been on a path towards deeper integration in security policies. This integration process involves balancing national sovereignty with the need for a supranational order to address security threats like terrorism. The role of transnational experts in security technology has been pivotal in shaping this new security landscape, suggesting a move towards an EU Homeland Security framework3. This shift indicates a growing acceptance of shared sovereignty in favor of enhanced security.
Sovereignty for Security in Central Europe
Membership in EU and NATO: In Central Europe, the debate over EU and NATO membership has been closely tied to issues of sovereignty and security. Proponents argue that membership provides security guarantees and protects sovereignty, while opponents fear it erodes national sovereignty. This tension reflects the region's historical struggles for national sovereignty and the defensive stance towards supranational integration4. The interplay between sovereignty and security remains a contentious issue in Central European political discourse.
Evolution and Devolution of Sovereignty and Security
Post-Cold War Dynamics: The post-Cold War era has seen significant changes in the dynamics of sovereignty and security in Europe. The integration of security policies and defense industries within the EU has been a key aspect of this evolution. This integration aims to create a more unified and effective security framework, addressing challenges like the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and regional conflicts5. The ongoing process of European security integration highlights the need for a balance between national sovereignty and collective security.
Recalibrating Sovereignty-Related Norms
Non-Traditional Security Challenges: Addressing non-traditional security challenges, such as piracy, terrorism, and cross-border conflicts, requires multilateral responses. The EU has made progress in conceptualizing sovereignty in terms of 'constitutional independence,' allowing for more effective cooperation in these areas. However, the principle of non-interference remains a significant obstacle. Recalibrating sovereignty-related norms is essential for improving human rights and addressing these security challenges6.
Government Preferences for Institutional Change
Foreign and Security Policy: EU member states have varying preferences for the depth of institutional change in foreign and security policy. These preferences are influenced by factors such as power capabilities, collective identities, and domestic governance structures. The debate over the locus of sovereignty reflects broader questions about the future trajectory of European unification and the prospects for consensual political integration7.
Conclusion
The relationship between European sovereignty and security is complex and multifaceted. The EU's efforts to balance national sovereignty with the need for collective security have led to significant changes in governance structures and policy frameworks. Concepts like digital sovereignty and strategic autonomy are reshaping the landscape of European security, highlighting the ongoing evolution of sovereignty in response to contemporary security challenges.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
Digital/sovereignty and European security integration: an introduction
Digital sovereignty redefines European security integration by affecting the development and control of digital infrastructures, as well as the use of digital tools for security governance.
The Sharing of Sovereignty: The European Paradox
European governments a role in coordinating and coordinating the activities of dierent institutions, transforming the traditional concept of sovereignty in Europe.
Highly CitedAn EU Homeland Security?1 Sovereignty vs. Supranational Order
An EU Homeland Security is a potential future for Europe, challenging sovereignty beliefs and potentially ceding ground to a supranational order in combating terrorism.
Evolution and Devolution: The Dynamics of Sovereignty and Security in Post-Cold War Europe
Post-Cold War Europe's security regime has evolved from nationalism to security integration and defense-industrial integration, with the southern flank facing proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
Recalibrating Sovereignty-Related Norms: Europe, Asia and Non-Traditional Security Challenges
Recalibrating sovereignty-related norms is crucial for addressing non-traditional security challenges, promoting human rights and promoting multilateral responses.
Explaining Government Preferences for Institutional Change in EU Foreign and Security Policy
EU member governments' preferences for institutional change in foreign and security policy are influenced by power capabilities, collective identities, and domestic sovereignty ideas.
Highly CitedThe EU’s hegemonic imaginaries: from European strategic autonomy in defence to technological sovereignty
The EU's use of "strategic autonomy" and "technological sovereignty" in various policy fields, including defense, tech, and digital, is shaping collective thinking and potentially impacting European security integration.
Digital sovereignty, geopolitical imaginaries, and the reproduction of European identity
Digital sovereignty projects, such as 5G, Gaia-X, and the semiconductor industry, contribute to a distinct EU identity as an agile, future-oriented global player in the digitized economy, even if true European digital sovereignty remains unattainable.
Politicising European security: from technocratic to contentious politics?
European security has evolved from a technocratic to contentious politics, influenced by diverse demands and critiques from various political camps, and increasingly entwined with contemporary crises.
Try another search
What are the strategies for addressing the social and ethical challenges posed by the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and robotics?
What makes the snow melt?
What is the role of robotics in elderly care and assistance?
young people with disability in sociology
Why do we have to eat fruits and vegetables?
What measures can prevent osteoarthritis?