International law, it is a fundamental principle that should guide the use of lethal autonomous weapon systems to preserve moral agency and human dignity.

Fighting Machines: Autonomous Weapons and Human Dignity, Dan Saxon (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2022), 264 pp., cloth $75, eBook $75.

An international ban on autonomous weapon systems is justified by human rights and humanitarian principles, ensuring that lethal decisions are made by humans and not machines.

On banning autonomous weapon systems: human rights, automation, and the dehumanization of lethal decision-making

The strongest argument for a ban on autonomous weapons systems is the principle of distinction, but technological progress may render this argument obsolete and may undermine the principle of human dignity.

Prohibiting Autonomous Weapons: Put Human Dignity First

Autonomous weapons systems can generally comply with international humanitarian law, but require discussion, acceptance, and institutionalization of their classification and responsibility allocation.

AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

Human rights law clarifies that the only acceptable definition of autonomy in weapons systems for law enforcement purposes requires meaningful human control, suggesting a ban on fully autonomous machines is desirable.

What Do Human Rights Really Say About the Use of Autonomous Weapons Systems for Law Enforcement Purposes?

Autonomous weapons pose legal, ethical, and societal challenges, with human judgment being crucial for assigning accountability and addressing legal concerns.

Autonomous Weapons and Human Responsibilities

Autonomous Weapons Systems (AWS) raise ethical and legal concerns, highlighting the need for future international regulation on their legality and shared control relationship with humans.

Autonomous Weapons Systems and International Law

Autonomous weapon systems in law enforcement operations may violate human rights, particularly the right to life, as they cannot comply with existing case law on the right to life.

POSITIVE HUMAN RIGHTS OBLIGATION OF STATES AND THE USE OF AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS DURING LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS

Autonomous weapons systems may be against human dignity, but other technologies and weapons also do, so it is wiser to draw on multiple objections rather than solely relying on human dignity.

Autonomous weapons systems, killer robots and human dignity

Autonomous weapons do not fully comply with International Humanitarian Law, particularly a fully autonomous weapon, due to their limited human control and AI engagement.

The Compliance Of Autonomous Weapons To International Humanitarian Law: Question Of Law And Question Of Fact

Fully autonomous weapons systems should not be used in law enforcement due to their potential impact on bodily integrity and dignity, and their lack of meaningful human control.

Human Rights and the use of Autonomous Weapons Systems (AWS) During Domestic Law Enforcement

Autonomous weapon systems may commit war crimes without intentional or reckless actions, necessitating a legal regime to hold states accountable for injurious wrongs caused by their use.

War Torts: Accountability for Autonomous Weapons

Autonomous weapon systems have significant implications for international humanitarian law, requiring careful legal analysis and measures to maintain the efficacy of the law in armed conflicts.

Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Law of Armed Conflict

Human control over autonomous weapon systems is a legal obligation derived from international humanitarian law, not just a political demand.

Autonomous Weapon Systems and Human Control

Autonomous Weapon Systems (AWS) in armed conflict may jeopardize international humanitarian law principles, but commanders can be held liable for war crimes resulting from their use.

Command responsibility of autonomous weapons under international humanitarian law

Autonomous weapon systems (AWS) pose a responsibility gap, and establishing training, testing, and observation obligations can help avoid malfunctioning.

Convicting Autonomous Weapons?

An international ban on autonomous weapon systems (AWS) is needed to address potential military advantages, ethical concerns, and potential uncontrolled escalation in armed conflicts.

Autonomous Weapon Systems - Dangers and Need for an International Prohibition

A categorical ban on autonomous weapon systems is unjustified morally and legally, favoring case-by-case legal evaluation under international law of armed conflict.

Debating Autonomous Weapon Systems, their Ethics, and their Regulation under International Law

Autonomous Weapons Systems (AWS) pose significant ethical concerns and require a legal solution beyond International Humanitarian Law (IHL) to address unique concerns and address potential conflicts.

Autonomous Weapons Systems: Taking the Human Out of International Humanitarian Law

Lethal Autonomous Weapons (LAWs) pose significant threats to society and international law, and strict laws are needed to prevent their use and potential violations of ethical and legal positions.

Examining Lethal Autonomous Weapons through the Lens of International Humanitarian Law

write a thesis title about human protection from Autonomous Weapon Systems in international law

These studies suggest "Human Protection from Autonomous Weapon Systems: Legal, Ethical, and Humanitarian Perspectives in International Law."