Paper
Appraisal of and Coping with a Real-Life Stressful Situation: The Contribution of Attachment Styles
Published Apr 1, 1995 · DOI · M. Mikulincer, V. Florian
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
478
Citations
21
Influential Citations
Abstract
The current study assesses the impact of attachment style on the ways young adults react to the stress of 4-month combat training. Ninety-two Israeli recruits completed an attachment scale at the beginning of the training. Their appraisal of the training their ways of coping with it, and peer evaluations of their leadership ability were assessed 4 months later. Compared with secure persons, ambivalent persons reported more emotion-focused coping, appraised the training in more threatening terms, appraised themselves as less capable of coping with the training, and were evaluated by their peers as less fitting for military leadership. Avoidant persons reported more distancing coping and less support seeking and appraised the training in more threatening terms. They did not differ from secure persons in the appraisal of their ability to cope with the training or in the nominations they received for leadership positions. Results are discussed in the framework of attachment theory.
Ambivalent and avoidant attachment styles impact young adults' reactions to and coping with stress in combat training, with ambivalent individuals showing emotion-focused coping and avoidant individuals showing distancing coping.
Full text analysis coming soon...