Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of the Relative Effect on Plaque Index among Pediatric Patients Using Powered (Electric) versus Manual Toothbrushes

doi:10.3390/dj11020046

Paper

Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of the Relative Effect on Plaque Index among Pediatric Patients Using Powered (Electric) versus Manual Toothbrushes

Published Feb 1, 2023 · A. Graves, Troy Grahl, Mark A. Keiserman

Dentistry Journal

Q2 SJR score

14

Citations

0

Influential Citations

Open Access PDF Full text Semantic Scholar

Abstract

Although many randomized controlled trials (RCT) have evaluated the efficacy of powered or electric toothbrushes compared with manual or traditional toothbrushes to remove biofilm and plaque, only one systematic review has been published for pediatric patients. The primary objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta analysis for this population. Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol, N = 321 studies were initially identified. Three independent, blinded abstract reviews were completed resulting in a total of n = 38/322 or 11.8% for the final analysis (n = 27 non-orthodontic, n = 11 orthodontic studies). Meta analysis of these outcome data have revealed a strong reduction in plaque index scores among pediatric patients using electric toothbrushes of approximately 17.2% for non-orthodontic patients and 13.9% for orthodontic patients. These results provide strong clinical evidence for recommending electric toothbrushing to pediatric patients, as well as those patients undergoing orthodontic therapy and treatment.

Meta-Analysis

Study Snapshot

Electric toothbrushes significantly reduce plaque index scores in pediatric patients, with 17.2% for non-orthodontic patients and 13.9% for orthodontic patients.

PopulationOlder adults (50-71 years)

Sample size24

MethodsObservational

OutcomesBody Mass Index projections

ResultsSocial networks mitigate obesity in older groups.

Sign up to use Study Snapshot

Consensus is limited without an account. Create an account or sign in to get more searches and use the Study Snapshot.

Create an account

Paper

Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of the Relative Effect on Plaque Index among Pediatric Patients Using Powered (Electric) versus Manual Toothbrushes

Sign up to use Study Snapshot

References

A 12-Week Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Novel Electric Toothbrush With an Extra Gentle Brush Head to a Manual Toothbrush for Plaque and Gingivitis Reduction.

The novel O-R toothbrush with micro-vibrations and extra gentle brush head significantly reduced gingivitis and plaque compared to a manual toothbrush over 12 weeks.

YoutubeTM for information on pediatric oral health instructions.

YouTube videos on pediatric oral health instructions have poor content, medium quality, and moderate reliability, but may be useful and educational for individuals.

The efficacy of powered toothbrushes: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Powered toothbrushes show a small improvement in dental plaque removal compared to manual toothbrushes, supporting their recommendation for daily use.

A randomized, 3-month, parallel-group clinical trial to compare the efficacy of electric 3-dimensional toothbrushes vs manual toothbrushes in maintaining oral health in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Electric 3D and manual toothbrushes show no significant difference in plaque removal efficacy and gingival inflammation reduction in adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Anti-gingivitis and Anti-plaque Efficacy of an Oral Hygiene System: Results From a 12-Week Randomized Controlled Trial.

The oral hygiene system involving an electric toothbrush, fluoride toothpaste, and floss effectively reduces gingivitis and plaque compared to a manual toothbrush and sodium fluoride dentifrice.

Citations

A Narrative Review on Advancing Pediatric Oral Health: Comprehensive Strategies for the Prevention and Management of Dental Challenges in Children

Combining preventive strategies, such as dental sealants and fluoride applications, can significantly reduce dental caries in children.

Electric powered toothbrush vs manual – which is more efficient?

Electric powered toothbrushes are more effective than manual toothbrushes in plaque removal and gingival inflammation for healthy individuals, children, and those with fixed orthodontics.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of novel oral hygiene aids in the prevention of gingival diseases in children and adolescents with special healthcare needs – A systematic review and meta-analysis

Novel mechanical oral hygiene aids, such as novel toothbrushes, and chlorhexidine spray, are more effective than manual toothbrushes in controlling plaque in children and adolescents with special healthcare needs.

Comparison Between Powered and Manual Toothbrushes Effectiveness for Maintaining an Optimal Oral Health Status

Power toothbrushes generally outperform manual toothbrushes in reducing plaque, gingivitis, and stains, with less pronounced benefits for special populations like the elderly and those with intellectual disabilities.

Oral Prevalence of Selenomonas noxia Differs among Orthodontic Patients Compared to Non-Orthodontic Controls: A Retrospective Biorepository Analysis

Orthodontic patients have a higher prevalence of the periodontal pathogen Selenomonas noxia compared to non-orthodontic controls.