1.5 degrees celsius climate change
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
The Implications of Limiting Global Warming to 1.5 Degrees Celsius
Introduction to 1.5 Degrees Celsius Climate Change
The goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels has become a critical target in international climate policy, particularly following the Paris Agreement. This target is seen as essential to mitigate the most severe impacts of climate change on natural and human systems. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has provided extensive evidence on the benefits of this target, emphasizing that the risks associated with higher levels of warming are significantly greater 13.
Risks and Impacts of Exceeding 1.5 Degrees Celsius
Accelerating Risks and Tipping Points
Research indicates that the risks associated with each incremental increase in temperature are not linear but accelerate as temperatures rise. For example, coral reefs, which are highly sensitive to temperature changes, can appear healthy until a sudden onset of mass bleaching and mortality occurs, leading to rapid ecosystem collapse . This principle of "accelerating risk" suggests that the transition from 1.5°C to 2.0°C will involve disproportionately higher risks .
Regional Impacts: Asia's Glaciers and Australian Extremes
In Asia, glaciers in the high mountains are crucial for water supply to millions of people. A global temperature rise of 1.5°C is projected to result in a warming of 2.1°C in these regions, leading to significant glacier mass loss and serious consequences for regional water management . Similarly, in Australia, limiting warming to 1.5°C is expected to reduce the likelihood of extreme heat events by about 25%, compared to a 2°C scenario, thereby lessening the risk of record heat and associated environmental damage .
Global and Cross-Sectoral Impacts
The impacts of global warming are not uniform across regions and sectors. In Europe, while some areas might experience benefits such as reduced electricity demand and increased hydropower yields, these positive impacts are overshadowed by broader negative consequences, including potential disruptions in food production and increased political instability . Moreover, the IPCC's special report highlights that most scenarios aiming to limit warming to 1.5°C include a period of overshoot, where temperatures temporarily exceed the target before stabilizing, which could have significant conservation-related impacts .
Feasibility and Challenges of Achieving the 1.5 Degrees Celsius Target
Current Efforts and Emission Pathways
Despite the ambitious goals set by the Paris Agreement, current global efforts are insufficient to limit warming to 1.5°C. The Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) submitted by countries are projected to result in a median warming of 2.6-3.1°C by 2100, indicating a need for substantial enhancement in mitigation commitments 48. The primary barriers to achieving the 1.5°C target are not geophysical but stem from political and technological inertia, requiring stronger leadership and societal recognition of the need for systemic changes .
Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies
Limiting global warming to 1.5°C would reduce the need for transformative adaptation by lessening the risk of extreme events and associated damages. However, even with lower levels of warming, significant impacts and adaptation costs are expected, particularly in vulnerable regions. Anticipatory adaptation planning is crucial to manage these risks effectively, and investments in adaptation should be justified even for low levels of climate change .
Conclusion
The evidence underscores the critical importance of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius to mitigate severe climate impacts. While the benefits of achieving this target are clear, the challenges are substantial, requiring enhanced global cooperation, ambitious mitigation efforts, and proactive adaptation strategies. The urgency of deepening commitments and actions to stabilize global temperatures at this level cannot be overstated, as the costs of inaction far outweigh the investments needed to achieve this goal 1348.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic