Adhd symptoms dsm 5
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
ADHD Symptoms in DSM-5: An Overview
Introduction to ADHD and DSM-5 Criteria
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent patterns of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that interfere with functioning or development. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), provides the criteria for diagnosing ADHD, which includes specific symptoms and thresholds for both children and adults.
Changes from DSM-IV to DSM-5
Symptom Thresholds and Prevalence
One of the significant changes in DSM-5 is the reduction in the number of symptoms required for diagnosing ADHD in adults. While DSM-IV required six out of nine symptoms in either the inattentive or hyperactive/impulsive domains, DSM-5 lowered this threshold to five symptoms for adults. This change has led to an increase in the prevalence of diagnosed ADHD among adults, with studies showing a 27% increase in expected prevalence when comparing DSM-IV to DSM-5 criteria 24.
Impact on Symptom Identification
The wording changes in DSM-5 have also influenced symptom endorsement. Parents of adolescents with ADHD identified more symptoms under DSM-5 compared to DSM-IV-TR, with an average increase of 1.15 additional symptoms. This increase was consistent across various demographic factors 39. Specific symptoms such as difficulty sustaining attention, being easily distracted, and difficulty organizing tasks saw significant increases in endorsement .
Symptom Dimensions and Validity
Inattention and Hyperactivity-Impulsivity
The DSM-5 continues to recognize two primary dimensions of ADHD symptoms: inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity. Studies have shown that inattentive symptoms are the most significant predictors of impairment in adults 210. Confirmatory factor analyses have supported a bifactor model with a single general factor and two specific factors for ADHD symptoms, indicating that the structure of ADHD symptoms in DSM-5 is consistent with previous editions .
Executive Dysfunction and Emotional Dyscontrol
Research has highlighted that adults with ADHD often exhibit deficits in higher-level executive functioning and emotional control, which are not fully captured by the DSM-5 criteria. Exploratory factor analysis has identified four factors in adult ADHD: executive dysfunction/inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, and emotional dyscontrol. These findings suggest that executive dysfunction is as central to adult ADHD as the traditional DSM-5 symptoms, while emotional dyscontrol is a distinct but related aspect .
Diagnostic Performance and Cultural Considerations
Screening and Diagnostic Tools
The performance of screening instruments for ADHD diagnosis can vary. In a study conducted in Mozambique, the DSM-5 criteria for the number of symptoms (criterion A) were found to be adequate, but the screening instruments based solely on parent or teacher reports showed low diagnostic performance . This highlights the importance of comprehensive assessments that consider cultural contexts and multiple sources of information.
Co-occurrence with Other Disorders
The DSM-5 has also made changes regarding the co-diagnosis of ADHD with other disorders, such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Previous editions discouraged diagnosing ADHD if symptoms occurred only during the course of a pervasive developmental disorder. However, DSM-5 allows for the co-diagnosis of ADHD and ASD, acknowledging the frequent co-occurrence and overlapping genetic etiologies of these conditions .
Conclusion
The DSM-5 has introduced several important changes to the diagnostic criteria for ADHD, particularly for adults. These changes have led to increased prevalence rates and improved symptom identification. However, the complexity of ADHD, especially in adults, suggests that further refinement of the criteria may be necessary to fully capture the range of symptoms and impairments associated with the disorder. Comprehensive assessments and consideration of cultural contexts remain crucial for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic