Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
Some studies suggest beta-blockers are effective in preventing atrial fibrillation onset, controlling heart rate, and improving survival in heart failure patients, while other studies question their preferred use for rate control in atrial fibrillation.
20 papers analyzed
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that significantly impacts morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with heart failure (HF). Beta blockers are a cornerstone in the management of HF and are frequently used to control heart rate and rhythm in AF patients. This article synthesizes recent research on the efficacy and safety of beta blockers in the context of AF.
Beta blockers have been shown to effectively prevent the onset of AF in patients with heart failure. A meta-analysis of clinical trials involving 11,952 patients demonstrated that beta blockers significantly reduced the incidence of AF from 39 to 28 per 1000 patient-years, representing a 27% relative risk reduction. This preventive effect was consistent across most trials, except for the SENIORS study, which included older patients with a higher baseline prevalence of AF.
In patients with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (HTN LVH), beta blockers, in addition to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers, are recommended to decrease the incidence of AF. This combination therapy is particularly important as HTN LVH is a significant risk factor for AF, which can lead to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous beta blockers with other pharmacological agents in managing acute AF and atrial flutter. The study found no significant difference in heart rate reduction or the proportion of patients achieving target heart rate between beta blockers and other medications. However, beta-1 selective beta blockers were found to be more effective and safer compared to non-selective beta blockers, which were associated with higher incidences of hypotension and bradycardia.
In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), beta blockers have been associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality. A substudy of the AF-CHF trial showed that beta blockers reduced mortality by 28% in patients with both AF and HFrEF, although they did not significantly reduce hospitalizations. Another meta-analysis confirmed that beta blockers did not reduce mortality in AF patients as effectively as in those with sinus rhythm, highlighting a potential differential effect based on heart rhythm.
The FAR NHL registry study indicated that higher doses of beta blockers were associated with better survival outcomes in chronic heart failure patients, regardless of the presence of AF. Patients receiving higher doses of beta blockers had significantly better survival rates without primary endpoints such as death or hospitalization.
A meta-analysis comparing beta blockers and amiodarone for preventing postoperative AF after cardiac surgery found no significant difference between the two in terms of AF episodes, duration, mean ventricular rate, or hospital length of stay. Both agents were equally effective in preventing postoperative AF.
Beta blockers play a crucial role in the management of atrial fibrillation, particularly in patients with heart failure. They are effective in preventing the onset of AF, reducing mortality in HFrEF patients, and managing acute AF when using beta-1 selective agents. While beta blockers and amiodarone are equally effective in preventing postoperative AF, the choice of agent may depend on individual patient characteristics and comorbidities. Overall, beta blockers remain a first-line treatment for AF, especially in patients with concurrent heart failure.
Most relevant research papers on this topic